Friday, March 24, 2006

Why Muslim Men Prefer Sheep

I've read a few posts recently that say Muslim men are allowed to have sex with farm animals. Check out Islamic Evil blog (see links) for details. One Muslim guy was caught with another man's goat and had to pay the owner a dowry for the animal (true story) just as if it were the man's new bride. The Muslim and goat were last seen shopping for curtains in west Tehran.

As Ken at Islamic Evil points out, Islam's extreme treatment of women and harsh repression of natural sex urges has resulted in some perverted and sick practices among the Religion of Piece. Because of this, Muslim men have sex with boys, goats and even infants (in a process called "thighing").

Hey Muslims, get a clue: God invented WOMEN for that purpose. Remove those idiotic and hideous shrouds from your women and enjoy them.

18 comments:

  1. Hey Stogie, you said to start with the news media when I commented on questioning everything. That is a start. There is so much going on that is right, happy, good, benificial etc. and yet all they protray is the divisions, hatred and destruction. They want no peace - peace does not sell paper/air.
    No wonder why so many have a warped view of mankind/life.
    I believe it is about time for mankind to take a look at it's focus to see what it's reality "really" is.
    I have faith that seeds scattered on rocky ground will take root, in time.
    I am moving on now,
    Gary
    PS, I truly do think your talents could be better used.

    ReplyDelete
  2. PS, PS
    Go see Bill's comment today:
    http://billtotten.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Okay Gary, so long. I am not really sure where Bill Totten is coming from, but we do not seem to be political allies. I notice that he has posted one of Noam Chomsky's rants, and I despise Noam Chomsky - he's a Marxist with an almost obsessive hatred of his own country whose views on reality are a cross between radicalism and tin-foil hat nuttery. You seem to want me to read between the lines and come to the same "awakening" that you have reached. Let's just say that I am somewhat dense. Spell it out for me. Are you an isolationist? A socialist? A paleo-conservative? What?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have faith that seeds scattered on rocky ground will take root, in time.
    ME THINKS HE IS A CHRISTIAN. SEEDS ON THE GROUND IS ONE OF CHRIST'S MAIN PARABLES.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For more info on 'thighing' see http://islamstrueface.blogspot.com/2005/07/more-on-pedopheliaand-thighing.html

    The question is, how does a bombhead get access to children so young? There are pedophilia problems in Muslim areas of Europe, but schoolage Kafir kids are the main targets. Presumably the only infants who will be available for a Muslim's satisfaction will be his own relatives. Or are there such things as Kinderbrothels in Muzzieland?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stogie,
    I am not sure what to call myself. Infact I do not like "boxes" - I like more wiggle room.
    Maybe a realist comes close. I see things as - just is what it is, and try to deal with the needs.
    Christians are getting a bad rap - and to some extent desreve it. As I said before I am of the opinion that religion has done more harm than good.
    As for Bill's blog, I was only hoping for you to see the information about the coming oil crisis. It is real, a very big deal, and needs personal responsibility to fix it. I do not know what his agenda is - and do not care - he put forth some good articles, that's all.
    Seeds of thought, yes a Jesus statement, I like and follow His message. The key, in my mind, is seeds of THOUGHT. That can/will heal the divisions.
    So - I am a guy who sees that religion is not working - just look at the world. And- I know that personal responsibility is the solution.
    Call me what you will, I just want to help man out of the muck of the "boxes".
    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  7. See Bill's Sunday blog.

    "They do not expect that any transition will be easy: "energy consumption is indispensable to our standard of living and a necessity for the Army to carry out its mission. However, current trends are not sustainable. The impact of excessive, unsustainable energy consumption may undermine the very culture and activities it supports. There is no perfect energy source; all are used at a cost."”
    "

    Gary
    PS, I'll check again for any comment from you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. So is Bill an enviro-nut? One of those guys who wants to go back to horses and buggies? We have enough oil to last for several centuries if we will but drill for it. On top of that, we can build more nuclear power plants and have clean energy for centuries more.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No - Bill is not the enviro nut - he is qouting others who seem to know what they are talking about.
    The US Army/military is looking closely at the problem, as is science.
    Nuclear is not the answer - execpt short term.
    Do you have some scource, science to back up your statement that there is oil to last centuries? Many scientists and oil people do not think that way, in-fact all that I have read says it is not a question of if - but when, and thay all say when is SOON.
    Look into it more, look at the numbers that are quoted and do your own math.
    I have watched this issue for over a year, and the signs are out there.
    Afganistan, Iraq and Iran may be about terrorism, at least as an excuse - but it is more about access to oil than we want to think - and for good reasons!

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  10. Gary, yes, I can back it up better than you can about us running out of oil. Also, the idea that we are seeking an empire in the Middle East so we can steal their oil is a major idea of the Kook Left. I don't buy it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. These are not my ideas, but I can cause for concern.

    So - back up your statement.

    Post your scources.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  12. By the way, I did not say empire.
    England, Germany, Japan etc. where we have bases are not part of an empire.
    However, having stablilty in the middle east is in our interest, as an emabrgo (like the 70's) would cause our economy great harm.
    That from economists, not oil or political people.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gary, I agree that we are at risk of an oil embargo and that we should start a crash program to achieve energy independence. However, there are no practical alternatives to fossil fuels at this time and probably won't be for decades. So I say we drill Anwar, drill offshore, process the enormous oil reserves locked in oil shale under Colorado.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A crash program - YOU ARE RIGHT !
    We need it, and I was hoping you would use some of your talent to help push it along.

    On the other side, drilling ANWR will happen, it may take up to 10 years to get the oil flowing from there. In the mean time existing wells will peak off, and severely slow down. Gas will be way too expensive and our economy will take a big pinch. (I hope that's all)
    Oil shale - not feasible - untiol gas is out sitein price.
    Here's the thing about oil/gasoline:
    The only reason it works is because there WAS so much of it, and it was easy to get. Changing.
    Gasolinr returns about 75-80% of the evergy used to process it when burned in a car, let's say. That is a net negative. Up untill now - not a big deal - there is so much!

    Alcohol, on the other hand provides about 125% of the energy used to process it. That's a net positive. And not so much pollution. So what is better/ NAd besides, Mother Nature is forcing our hand! She really is!

    There is no practical answer because oil was so easy. Now we need the crash program - and even at that we may need the bicycles from time to time! :-)

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sorry, I accidently hit publish before I reviewed for typos!!!!
    I think it was readable tho.
    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ok - so i guess you are not going to post scources about oil supply. that's ok, because running out of oil is not the problem.
    The problem is when world wide demand is higher than the ability to provide. That will happen way - way sooner than any runout scenario. From then on it gets worse as supply actually declines.
    Economist say as little as 3-5% gap in supply and demand will cause ripples thru the economy.

    Any way - to make a long story short, conservation is paramount. We need oil for more than transportation, but transportation is where big savings can be had. Most people do not even realise that the roads are there via oil as well as the gas in the tank.

    So - I know your purpose for this blog is something else (even tho I dissagree with your technique), and you probably want me to stop mucking up your space.
    So I leave with this parting thought, You may not want to ride a bicycle, myself I love it - and do - 4 miles to work -- but you could drive less with a little planning. As a whole we must!!!

    Gary
    PS, Go check out Bill Totten's last couple posts!!! Oil reaches deep into our lives.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Read 4-1-06 post:
    http://billtotten.blogspot.com/

    We can let it be too late!
    Or we can become part of the solution. Hell, we are the solution when not distracted by the forces of power.

    I want to help bring about change that will ease the hardships facing man. Man is his own enemy, when allowing himself to be a sheeple!

    We all have choices.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  18. What a great site, how do you build such a cool site, its excellent.
    »

    ReplyDelete