Since you're a tax guy allow me to float something by you that's been on my math challenged mind.
All these think tanks are coming up with figures that show people in the lower brackets will end up paying more taxes. However, if the majority of these people don't pay any taxes now and actually, in many cases, get a refund, then the so-called "increase in taxes" would not be an out-of-pocket expense, but instead would represent money not received in refunds for something that was never paid in the first place. Did you follow my thinking?
It's sounds like typical Washington double speak ie: we were going to spend 10 billion but instead we spent 8 billion so see, silly people, we "cut" or "saved" 2 billion.
I think the fact that Obama is now demonizing 999 speaks volumes.
‘Tis Not Our War
-
A review of ‘Tis Not Our War: Avoiding Military Service in the Civil War
North (Stackpole Books, 2024) by Paul Taylor Since the infamous 2020
“Summer of Lo...
Trump's Anti-Weaponization Fund: The Facts
-
Photo Credit:
Perchance AI
Perhaps the full $1.8 billion fund will not be required, but it is likely
that a substantial fund will be needed to compensa...
Inside the Corporate Diversity Cult
-
I escaped to tell the tale.
The post Inside the Corporate Diversity Cult appeared first on American
Renaissance.
1 day ago
Commenting and Graphics Policy
I create a lot of original graphics that I post on this site and anyone is free to use them. Links and attribution are appreciated. The graphics I create are signed "Stogie."
Hit the Tip Jar
Because Fine Cigars are a Human Right
CONTACT INFORMATION
If you have any comments, suggestions or news, please contact me at stogiechomper "at" gmail.com.
1 comment:
Great cartoon.
About 999
Since you're a tax guy allow me to float something by you that's been on my math challenged mind.
All these think tanks are coming up with figures that show people in the lower brackets will end up paying more taxes. However, if the majority of these people don't pay any taxes now and actually, in many cases, get a refund, then the so-called "increase in taxes" would not be an out-of-pocket expense, but instead would represent money not received in refunds for something that was never paid in the first place. Did you follow my thinking?
It's sounds like typical Washington double speak ie: we were going to spend 10 billion but instead we spent 8 billion so see, silly people, we "cut" or "saved" 2 billion.
I think the fact that Obama is now demonizing 999 speaks volumes.
Post a Comment