The information below was part of an earlier post, but I consider it important enough to have a post of its own.
Leftists are pushing back hard on the belief that right-to-carry laws deter crime. Some liberals and liberal institutions (like a professor at Stanford University) are publishing papers that say the opposite is true: that more guns means more crime and violence. See conclusions of the Stanford paper here.
Intuitively, the professor's claims do not make sense to me. If criminals know that a neighborhood has guns, would they be less likely to do home invasions or burglaries? If criminals know that there are right-to-carry laws in effect, would they be less likely to shoot up schools and theaters? I would think so. What makes less sense is that otherwise lawful citizens turn into criminals when they have ready access to guns. Absolute bunk, but liberals will believe anything.
REBUTTALS: I found two sites that rebut the Stanford study as sophomoric and biased. No surprise there. Read MORE JUNK, LESS SCIENCE: New Stanford “Working Paper” claims right-to-carry increases assaults by 33%
Also read: Right-to-Carry Gun Laws Linked to Increase in Violent Crime -- a rebuttal.
If liberals throw the Stanford study at you in argument, refer them to the above links. The Stanford study is superficial and highly biased.
Ohio State Students Protest Wendy’s With Hunger Strike
9 minutes ago