Showing posts with label Daily KOS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily KOS. Show all posts

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos Sweating Bullets Over Obama's Chances

Markos Moulitsas Sweating Bullets
With the pick of the handsome, young and articulate Paul Ryan as VP candidate under Romney, Markos Moulitsas appears to be having a nervous breakdown.  The obnoxious leftist jabbers like a squirrel on speed in his Daily Kos column this morning (via American Power).  See his caffeinated jabberings of "We're winning!" and "We need to go for the jugular, run up the score!"

Alas, poor Moulitsas.  He appears more in the midst of a nervous breakdown than in an ecstasy of expected victory.  The old Shakespearean observation would apply here:  Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

No doubt Moulitsas has been happy with the dismantling of American prosperity and freedom.  With just another four years of Obama, we could all be wearing red berets and kerchiefs around our necks, singing the  Internationale.  Now Moulitsas, appropriately tagged "the Daily Kos Rage Boy" by Donald Douglas, sees his glorious Red Dawn suppressed, cut short, terminated, kaput.  No more free lunch.

Oh boo hoo hoo, what's a radical rage boy to do?

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Did Left Wing Hate Speech Cause the Giffords Shooting?

Only two days before Rep Gabrielle Giffords was shot in Arizona, a blogger at the left wing site Daily Kos criticized Rep Giffords.  The liberal blogger lives in Giffords district in Arizona and had voted for her and supported her for election, but now was quite upset that Giffords had voted against Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader.  The blogger declared that Gabrielle Giffords was now "DEAD TO ME."  Interesting choice of words.  Did liberal assassin Jared Loughner read the Daily Kos post and internalize the headline as a suggestion to be taken literally?

The Daily Kos quickly scrubbed the post yesterday, but not before several conservative bloggers made a screenshot of it.  I got a copy of it from the American Thinker at this link and increased the size so it is more readable.  It is directly below.


UPDATE:  Michelle Malkin lists the Left's long legacy of political hatred and advocacy of violence, proving conclusively that liberalism is the author of violence and intolerance, NOT the Right.  See it here.

Monday, September 01, 2008

Bristol Palin is Five Months Pregnant

A breaking story from Reuters: Sarah Palin has announced that her 17 year old daughter Bristol is five months pregnant. Bristol intends to marry the father and keep the baby.

Reuters reports:

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child. Bristol Palin, one of Alaska Gov. Palin's five children with her husband, Todd, is about five months pregnant and is going to keep the child and marry the father, the Palins said in a statement released by the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old governor in any way.

McCain officials said the news of the daughter's pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called "mud-slinging and lies" circulating on liberal blog sites.

It should be noted that Bristol Palin conceived five months ago, or around April of this year -- the same month baby Trig was born to her mother.

This is the final, definitive proof that Bristol Palin could not possibly be the mother of Trig Palin.

Of course, we can now expect Bristol's real and actual pregnancy to become a new source of hateful, vicious and salacious cruelty by the radicals at the Daily Kos and Democratic Underground.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Daily KOS Smear Machine Rebutted: Palin's Daughter Was NOT the Mother

The Daily KOS is a vicious, leftwing site that often expressed unabashed hatred for Republicans and conservatives. However, it outdid itself yesterday when it posted a false report claiming that "Sarah Palin is Not the Mother." The Kos diarist (ArcXIX) claimed that Palin's 17 year old daughter was the actual mother of the Down's Syndrome child, Trig Palin. They offered this "proof":

1. Photographs of Sarah Palin taken late in her pregnancy show no sign of the abdominal bump that indicates pregnancy.

2. A Photograph of Palin's daughter allegedly taken in March of this year shows the daughter with a bump, or slightly swollen belly.

The facts are as follows:

1. Photographs of Palin supplied by the Daily KOS show Palin wearing heavy coats or in an obstructed view of her abdomen. Other photographs, such as this one from ABC News, show her in profile on February 10, 2008 and her swollen abdomen is noticeable.

2. A science teacher named Elizabeth Eubanks wrote of meeting Sarah Palin and her daughter Piper in the Fairbanks airport in March 2008, and noticed that Sarah Palin was indeed pregnant. Eubanks wrote of the encounter on April 29, 2008:

There were several of us Polar TRECers waiting in the Fairbanks, AK airport
to catch our planes home. We were chatting about all we had learned when Kristen
Timm, ARCUS administrator said “ Look, there is the Hottest Governor in the
United States” as she has been publicly deemed by media and fans. Of course
I had to check out the “Hottest Governor in the US” and quickly turned to see her
pregnant (she has since had her baby) with bags and daughter in tote.
3. Palin appeared before the Hoover Institution Board on Feb 26, 2008 to discuss the Alaskan gas pipeline. A photograph of her behind the lectern shows clear evidence of her pregnancy.
...
4. The photo of Bristol Palin that the Daily Kos claims shows her pregnant does not prove any such thing. Palin's baby was born on April 18, so the daughter would have to be 8 months pregnant in the photograph. The "bump" in the photo, however, is much smaller than that. It is only a slight midriff bulge. See top photo.

It turns out that the Daily Kos photo was not from March 2008, but was in fact taken in 2006 by the Daily Anchorage News. Trig was conceived in the summer of 2007. If you count 9 months backward from April 2008 he would have been conceived in July or August 2007. Maybe Bristol just needs to lay off the sweets. In any case, she could not have been pregnant with Trig whether the photo date was 2006 or 2008.

Another photo taken by a private individual shows Sarah Palin obviously pregnant with Trig late in the pregnancy in 2008. It is the second photo from the top.
...
Conclusions: the photographic evidence and personal account of Elizabeth Eubanks appears conclusive. Sarah Palin was pregnant with Trig and is his mother.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Response to Leftwing Bloggers Who Attacked KSFO Talk Radio

Newsbusters has continuing coverage of the Leftist assault on conservative KSFO talk radio in San Francisco. Noel Sheppard of Newsbusters debates Mike Stark of Calling All Wingnuts on the subject. Mike Stark assures us that conservatives make many more outrageous comments against the Left than the other way around. Most of us know that is completely false.

Here is the response I left to Mike Stark for his post "Debate" at Calling All Wingnuts.
Mike, you are wilfully uninformed on Leftist hate speech and slander against the Right. I suggest you read "Slander" by Ann Coulter or "Unhinged" by Michelle Malkin. They have lots of quotes uttered with complete sincerity by members of the liberal media and political establishment. When it comes to hate speech and outrageous statements, the Left is unsurpassed.

As for KSFO, you and Spocko have indeed misrepresented the station. I listen to the Lee Rodgers and Melanie Morgan show every weekday morning on the way to work and to the Brian Sussman show ever weekday evening on the way home. The show is largely satire. There have been no sincere statements that anyone should be executed without due process or whatever other silly and insincere charges you want to make.

Let's have an example. The next time you are upset with some conservative and you say "they should hang him to the highest tree" (a common exaggeration that no one would take seriously), maybe we can quote you and say Mike believes in lynching politicians he disagrees with. We can say, oh look at the hate speech from this man! He should apologize to the world and seek therapy.

The other night I was listening to another host on KSFO, Barbara Simpson, who was filling in for Brian Sussman who was away. She talked about the San Francisco mother, a black woman, who threw her three young children into the freezing waters of San Francisco Bay, killing them. Simpson said, I think they (the authorities) "should throw her in the Bay." So Mike and Spocko could quote her out of context and say "KSFO radio host advocates drowning a mentally impaired black woman." Well didn't she? No, she wasn't serious and only a complete moron would interpret her remarks as such. She was expressing anger at happened to the children.

She also talked about the guy in Missouri who kidnapped two young boys and held one of them for five years. The police caught him and put him in jail. They put him on "suicide watch." Simpson, disgusted with the pedophile's kidnappings, said, "why don't they give him a rope?" NEWSFLASH: "Barbara Simpson advocates lynching prisoners without a trial!" Again, she wasn't being serious.

KSFO radio is largely conversational. The hosts talk like the common citizen does in private conversation. They are sometimes angry (usually for good reason), sometimes frustrated. They joke around a lot. The bit about OV (Officer Vic) creating an audio satire of a NY Times editor being strapped to Old Sparky was about as serious as any skit you will see on "Saturday Night Live."

Once again, you misrepresent the truth for the purpose of slandering conservatives. If you want to sit down and have a serious debate, you will lose. The truth is not on your side.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Ex-Navy Pacifist Directs KOS Traffic to Saber Point

"Commander" Jeff Huber, whom I outed as the outspoken leftist and former Navy man known as "Jo Fish" a few months back, has linked one of his leftard posts to Saber Point.

Huber has an article in the leftwing Daily Kos, excoriating the planned "surge" in Iraq, which is not surprising. Huber categorically opposes ANY military action or strategy other than retreat and withdrawal. If Huber really was an officer in the Navy, I can only say, thank God he's out of the service. We don't need Quislings like him, or like John Kerry or John Murtha, serving in the armed forces of the United States. What we need are people who believe in their country, their military and the rightness of its causes. Clearly, "Commander" Jeff Huber isn't one of them.

One can only wonder what his motivation was for joining the military in the first place, since he clearly does not like it, trust it or believe in it. In fact, "Jo Fish" had posted the names and addresses of the Swiftboat Vets on his website a year or so back, enabling leftards to contact and harrass them. He took the names off only after I threatened to file a formal complaint with the U.S. Navy.

Huber has his own blog, Pen and Sword. What a laugh. Huber may be willing to use a pen, but he wouldn't touch a sword if his life (or ours) depended on it.

You can read Jeff "cut-and-run" Huber's Daily KOS piece here.

Or you can simply memorize all of his future articles and opinions. They are: the US is the aggressor in Iraq and anywhere else its military may be called to action. The only course of action that the US military should ever employ is withdrawal and retreat, or preferably, complete inaction in the face of hostile external threats.

Yeah we get it Jeff. Now stop posing as a Vet and get a pink dress so you can join "Code Pink." It's so much more your style.

Thursday, March 23, 2006

U.S. Marines v. John Murtha, Democrat

UPDATE: Welcome to all the the Krazy KOS Kids who were directed here by Coward Jeff Huber, also known as "Jo Fish," who hates everything military even though he claims to be a retired Naval officer.

Tell me, Jeff, why did you bother joining the military in the first place, since you believe that the US military can't win any fight and shouldn't even try? Wouldn't a stint in the Peace Corp have been more to your liking and political philosophy? What ever possessed a wimp like you to join the Navy?

I've said it before, Jeff (or Jo) and I'll say it again: you're a disgrace to the uniform, as is John Kerry and the flaming pansy, John Murtha. And your party, the Democrats, is the Party of Treason.