Muslim Students in the UK Demand Sharia-Compliant Student Loans

Muslim students in the UK are demanding interest free student loans, since paying interest is forbidden under Islamic law, or "Sharia" as it is called.  The UK has been the most Muslim-accommodating country in the western world, and also the one most quickly disintegrating.

Muslims once again demonstrate that they are not compatible with western culture, laws and traditions.   They should not be in the west.  Nevertheless, you can count on the leftists in the UK quickly granting their every demand.  They already have "halal" food, which is derived from animals slaughtered in a cruel and painful manner, women wearing veils and burkas, honor killings and genital mutilations.  What's next for the UK, public stoning of adulterers?

Kick them out.  Send them back to the barbarian hell-hole from which they sprang, and take the leftist enablers with them.

Security Experts Warn: Shariah Law Is A Danger to US

From the Washington Times, via Blazing Cat Fur:

A panel of national security experts who worked under Republican and Democratic presidents is urging the Obama administration to abandon its stance that Islam is not linked to terrorism, arguing that radical Muslims are using Islamic law to subvert the United States.

The study group, sponsored by the conservative-oriented Center for Security Policy, says in its report that proponents of advancing Islamic law mark the "crucial fault line" in Islam's internal divisions separating truly moderate Muslims, like the late Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid, from the large portion of the world's 1 billion Muslims who advocate imposing what they call Shariah law throughout the world.

According to the report, proponents of Shariah are "Muslim supremacists" waging "civilization jihad" along with the Islamist terrorists engaged in violent jihad, like al Qaeda.

Blazing Cat Fur has more links here.

Dhimmi Dimwits: Are You Enforcing Sharia Law in the United States?

Cartoon Hat Tip:  Sultan Knish

There are a lot of Dhimmi Dimwits who have appointed themselves Enforcers of Sharia Law.  Those who condemn protests of Islam and all of its attendant, gory violence, fall into this category.

Turn on the news and hear any newscaster discussing the spate of recent Koran burnings.  The newscaster will be speaking in his "Oh-ain't-it-awful" voice, as if he or she can barely suppress his outrage.  They will proudly intone that their station REFUSES to show any Koran burnings on camera, as if their high-mindedness was a badge of honor.  Actually, it's a badge of cowardice, indicating they are terrified of being killed by Muslim Jihadis for showing it.

The Dhimmitude associated with Islamization has already begun in the United States.  Meanwhile, we have media types, politicians, priests and even conservative bloggers running interference for Islam.

They may not know it, but they have become similar to the Jewish Kapos of the concentration camps:   they identify with the enemy and enforce his rules against the others, in the hope of being spared the gas chambers.

That analogy isn't completely accurate in the here and now.  Our modern Kapos aren't afraid of the gas chamber; they may be somewhat afraid of being targeted by violent Muslims, but there are greater reasons for their attitudes.   Our modern Dhimmi Enforcers of Sharia constantly defend Islam for these reasons:

1. They are ignorant of the nature, history, teachings and practices of Islam, i.e. that the religion is violent and totalitarian with a desire to rule the world.
2. They are hoping to escape the usual smears of the Democratic Party, e.g., that they are "racists" for opposing tyranny, or bigots for opposing "just another" religion, no matter how violent.
3. They are looking for public approval and admiration for being broad-minded, tolerant and enlightened (i.e., moral posturing).
4. They believe such demonstrations are necessary to get their candidates elected.

So the next time you criticize someone for criticizing or protesting Islam, think.  Do you really want to be the Saudi Religious Police in America?  An enforcer of Sharia law in the United States?  Because that is what you are actually doing.

Muslim Murders Toddler, Complains About Unveiled Mug Shot

We hear a lot today about "creeping sharia," how Muslim immigrants and insisting that western laws and customs give way to Muslim practices. The Left, in its self-hating desire to commit cultural suicide, are all for it. However, it isn't going to happen if conservatives have anything to say about it.

Take the very recent example of Nour Hadid, a 26 year old Muslim wife living in Orland Park, a village near Chicago. She had a two year old niece, "had" being the operative word here. Hadid was scolded by her husband and was so incensed about it, that she decided to take it out on the toddler. She beat the little girl to death over four days. Well, she also bit and pinched the child, effectively torturing her, and beating her with a wooden spoon. Authorities found that the little girl had 55 bruises and "was beaten from head to toe." Her aunt confessed to the crime.

Hadid was taken into custody and a mug shot taken of her head and shoulders, unveiled. Nour Hadid's husband has threatened to sue the Orland Park police for releasing a mug shot of his wife unveiled, saying that it "insults Islam."

The Southtown Star newspaper did its best for creeping sharia by running rationales about how the hijab is required in Islam and quoting a Muslim official asking the irrelevant question: If Nour had been a nun, would the police have treated her this way?

I would certainly hope so, but then again, nuns don't generally beat toddlers to death. They also don't wear hijabs that cover their faces.

..

Read the whole sorry story here.

..

It should be noted that Muslim practices include such illegal activities as honor killings, genital mutilation of young girls, wife beatings and violence against non-believers. How anyone could believe that Muslim criminals should be allowed to escape identification by wearing a veil in a mug shot really offends me.

.

via: Memeorandum

via: Southtown Star

Andrew McCarthy - "The Islamist Threat is Worse Than You Think"

I found another website worth mentioning and linking to. It's called SANE (Society of Americans for National Existence). They have posted an article by Andrew McCarthy of National Review entitled Beyond Terrorism: The Islamist Threat is Worse Than You Think.

In this article McCarthy describes and refutes the sophomoric beliefs that Jihad is a "peaceful, inner struggle" rather than a violent one, and that Sharia (Islamic law) is compatible with our western laws and, therefore able to be accommodated.

McCarthy describes our western angst in refusing to acknowledge that it is Islam itself that is the threat. He writes:

Because America is a beacon of religious freedom, we’ve limited our focus to operatives who plot and execute acts of terror; the ideology fueling this savagery is not our concern — lest we betray our first principles and smear every Muslim as a terrorist. This disposition is suicidal, for at least three reasons. First, Islam is not merely a religion. It is a comprehensive socio-economic and political system, which believers take to be ordained by Allah, its elements compulsory and non-negotiable. While those elements include tenets we would regard as a religious creed, these tenets constitute only a fraction of the overarching Islamic project.

McCarthy makes a lot of sense in this article. He dispels a lot of popular nonsense about the so-called "Religion of Peace."

Via: Creeping Sharia
Via: SANE