Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Stephen King, Leftist Hypocrite, Deplores Gun Violence and NRA (Photoshop)



Stephen King has written an essay called "Guns," in which he blames the National Rifle Association for recent massacres by mad men. Stephen King wrote:
"One only wishes Wayne LaPierre and his NRA board of directors could be drafted to some of these [violent] scenes, where they would be required to put on booties and rubber gloves and help clean up the blood, the brains, and the chunks of intestine still containing the poor wads of half-digested food that were some innocent bystander’s last meal."
It's too bad that Stephen King is a hypocritical leftist.  He has authored some of the best horror fiction ever written, novels like "Carrie," "IT" and "The Shining."  I have truly enjoyed his fiction and have savored his writing talent.  However, early in his career he wrote some dubious novels under the pen name of Richard Bachman.  One of those was a short novel called "Rage," in which a mentally disturbed student brings a gun to class, kills the teacher, and holds the classroom hostage while police gather outside.  I didn't like the story.  It was very violent but had no point, no moral message.  It was violence for the sake of violence.  There was no epiphany, no satisfying resolution.  I wondered why King would write such trash.

News Busters reports:
In subsequent years, numerous school murders occurred around the country with the assailants saying they had gotten the idea directly or loosely from "Rage."
One can only wonder if Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Seung-Hoi Cho, Eric Harris or Dylan Klebold got their ideas from "Rage."  All of these incidents involve some similarity to King's violent fiction, "Rage."  Indeed, Lanza, Cho, Harris and Klebold all carried out their gun murders on school grounds or campuses.  All four shot teachers and students to death.

Other documented cases connected with "Rage" are listed at Wikepedia here.

So when it's time to get the boots and buckets and mops to clean up the gore, maybe we should call on Stephen King, who has undoubtedly inspired mass murder with his fiction.  The NRA?  No.

Read more about it at News Busters here.


Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Monday, January 10, 2011

As One Democrat Goes After the Second Amendment, A Second Goes After the First

Another unscrupulous Democrat is taking advantage of the Arizona murders to attack the Constitution.  However, this Democrat is going after the First Amendment's protections for free speech.
Washington (CNN) - Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pennsylvania, said he will introduce legislation making it a federal crime for a person to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a Member of Congress or federal official.
Brady's decision to offer the legislation comes less than 24 hours after a gunman attempted to assassinate Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, in a shooting that claimed the lives of a federal judge, and a nine year-old girl, among others.
"This is not a wake up call, this is major alarms going off," he said.
Brady is particularly incensed over a web posting by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin during the 2010 election in which she targeted 20 House Democrats, including Giffords for political defeat. The posting showed a map of the United States with the 20 Democratic congressional districts identified by gun sights.
Brady is a flaming hypocrite.  He is "upset" by a map with gunsights on districts (not on people) but totally unmoved by brazen advocacy of presidential assassination as documented in my previous post.  That, however, is beside the point.  There is no connection between anything Sarah Palin said or did with the Arizona shootings.  Brady's disingenuous stand, therefore, is not designed to correct an actual condition, but to impugn Sarah Palin.

Such legislation, if passed, could be used in a highly subjective manner to persecute and prosecute political opponents by the party in power.  The left's relentless pursuit of censorship and suppression of free speech has a purpose:  they cannot win elections if their political opponents are allowed to speak.

Read the article here.  Hat tip to Moonbattery.

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Michael Moore Hates Capitalism, Loves Cash

Michael Moore, dedicated leftwing filmmaker, has a new film that will be released soon.  It's called "Capitalism, a Love Story."  Michael Moore hates capitalism, even though it's made him filthy rich.

Socialism always seems so wonderful from a safe distance and a large bank account.  For us, the toiling masses, it means a sharp reduction in opportunity for work, less goods and services in the marketplace and higher taxes.

So when Michael Moore's new propaganda film comes out, I will treat it like the first few:  I won't see it.  Let's all help Michael Moore kick the nasty capitalism habit and enjoy the fruits of socialism.  Namely, poverty.

Photoshop:  I did it.  Feel free to use it on your blogs and websites if you like.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Sonia Sotomayor: We Don't Need No Stinking Confirmation!






This is probably over the top. But then again, Sonia Sotomayor is over the top.
According to this website, Sonia Sotomayor supported Puerto Rican terrorists. If so, then her new nickname of "Soto-Bandito" is apt.

There's just something about Obama and terrorists: Bill Ayers, Sonia Sotomayor...who else?



Sunday, May 11, 2008

Bernie Ward Cops a Plea

Bernie Ward, former Catholic priest and confessed child-porn distributor, pleaded guilty to a Federal judge the other day. He's likely to serve at least five years.

Ward was also a talk-show host for KGO radio in San Francisco. Called "the Lion of the Left," he was a spokesman for extreme leftwing causes. Ward at first claimed the child porn he collected was research material for a book, but it appears he was "lyin' on the left."

ABC News did some research and found out that Ward was groping some of his young girl students when he taught high school. He plied them with marijuana and liquor and tried to get them to make out with him. They complained to high school officials but Ward was not prosecuted.

See the ABC news report and video here.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Bernie Ward: The truth comes out, and it ain't pretty

A few weeks ago a former liberal talk show host, Bernie Ward, was indicted on child pornography charges. Ward is an extreme leftist who also claims to be an ardent Christian. The main stream media claimed that Bernie was indicted solely on the basis of a couple of porn pictures that included minors, that it was all a big misunderstanding, that Bernie was doing research for a book. Since I once saw Bernie Ward speak at my son's Catholic high school (on, of all things, ethics), I felt a small connection to this man, so I defended him. He was a liberal and a political enemy, but does that justify ruining his life and career, over a couple of pictures? And what would that do to his wife and kids?

Since then, an enterprising journalist obtained the actual police report on Bernie Ward. Michael Savage has it posted at his website here. The police report shows that Ward's indictment was based on more than just a couple of pictures.

The report shows that Bernie Ward regularly chatted online with a woman calling herself "Sexfairy," a dominatrix who made Bernie confess his sins. Bernie sent her porn pictures that included minors. Sexfairy promptly reported Ward to the police. She then began recording a transcript of their online chats. Bernie claimed to have had sex with his own son, performing fellatio on the 14 year old boy. Ward claimed to have done other strange things too, like having sex with other men in a sleazy porn movie theater in San Mateo, California.

There is the possibility that Bernie's online chats only described sexual fantasies and not real acts (no doubt he will claim that); the facts will have to be established at trial. Bernie Ward is innocent until proven guilty. Nevertheless, Bernie Ward has seriously self-destructed as a champion of liberalism and likely will not likely be given much credence in the future by radio audiences (if he can find another job) or anyone else.

The newspapers reporting the facts have stated that Ward was a "talk show host," but not that he was a liberal talk show host. That inconvenient truth is nowhere to be found.