The Left doesn't have a clue. Their error, as always, is falsely believing that their paradigms, perspectives and presumptions are shared by all humanity. They aren't. The Muslim extremists don't care how inclusive you are or how you tiptoe around the facts of Islamic violence, terrorism and intolerance. Sugar-coated arsenic is just as deadly, though it may taste better when swallowed.
Another example of unbelievable idiocy is the quote by a EU official stating that "jihad is fighting the evil within yourself." What pure, unadulterated horse manure. Jihad means, and always has meant waging war against infidels to force them to accept Islam, or alternatively, to become Dhimmis or dead. There is absolutely nothing in Muslim tradition or scripture that suggests jihad is anything else. (Another aspect of liberals is that they will believe any fairy tale that justifies their inaction in the face of hostile enemies.)
James Taranto writes in today's Opinion Journal:
Who's to Blame for Radical Islam?Here are two views on the question, the first
described by London's Daily Telegraph:
European governments should shun the phrase "Islamic terrorism" in favour of "terrorists who abusively invoke Islam", say guidelines from EU officials.
Backed by diplomats and civil servants from the 25 EU members, the officials are drafting a "non-emotive lexicon for discussing radicalisation" to be submitted to Tony Blair and other leaders in June. . . .An EU official said: "The basic idea behind it is to avoid the use of improper words that would cause frustration among Muslims and increase the risk of radicalisation."
Along with civil servants from the Home Office, the officials have reviewed the impact of such terms as Islamist, fundamentalist and jihad when describing acts of terrorism and murder. "Jihad means something for you and me; it means something else for a Muslim," EU officials at a Berlin conference on radicalisation said. "Jihad is a perfectly positive concept of trying to fight evil within yourself."
6 comments:
Stogie, that is one fine piece of reportage. How to get the message out to everyone as effectively as does the legacy media? I'll leave your piece alone for a while and then sneak back and grab it whole for my own blog. I hope others will pick it up as well, we being something of a news wire service, as I see it.
Well done, mate.
Derek at The Study of Revenge has new work on display. He and Ken are making me so envious that I'm hardly able to sleep.
Dag, I know what you mean. It seems the most effective blogs are the ones that Google has tagged as offensive!
We must try harder, Dag!
Originally posted yesterday at http://alwaysonwatch.blogspot.com/
Ayatollah Khomeini said...
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Islam,
Good news! We have put our petrodollars together and bought some more birthday presents for our dear Prophet (pbuh).
As part of the recently launched global campaign for servility - sorry I meant civility - towards Islam, we have purchased the copyrights on all European languages. We haven't yet got control of the Queen's English but we do have full rights to Prince Charles'(pbuh) English, which will have to do for the moment.
I have been unable to work out the full cost of these purchases as my faith forbids me to touch the 'plus' sign on a calculator. However I can tell you that the Academie Francaise alone cost $24.95.
We shall reform all these languages to make them more civil, with the exception of Danish, which will be abolished in favor of Welsh (note to Archbishop of Wales and staff of Y Llan - servility has its rewards!).
It will become ungrammatical to use words with the roots 'Islam' and 'terror' in the same sentence. Terrorists will be known as 'Youths psychologically damaged by Zionism', bomb-belts will be known as 'body-warmers' and ricin as 'pixie-dust'.
For more details of these changes visit http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/010968.php
Earlier AOW asked how do I come up with my material. I'm actually divinely inspired by Allah's three daughters: al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat. They appeared to me in a dream saying 'Why can't these Muzzies lighten up a bit and laugh at themselves like the Jooooz do?'
And yes, I know you're all wondering, what did Allah's daughters look like?
Well, they were stark naked with big boobs and clits like eggs.
Allahu Akhbar
- Ayatollah Khomeini
Disqualified veterinarian
Nice idea with this site its better than most of the rubbish I come across.
»
Your website has a useful information for beginners like me.
»
Post a Comment