Saturday, April 22, 2006

Notes on "Defeating Jihad" by Serge Trifkovic


I finished reading Serge Trifkovic's "Defeating Jihad" last night. It is like a series of body punches to Leftists and liberals, or what Trifkovic refers to as "the elite class." With regard to Islam, Trifkovic first accurately defines the problem and then gives the solution. The book is organized as follows:

Part I - Understanding the Threat. Describes Muhammad's legacy, Islamic beliefs, what Jihad actually means (no, it's not an "inner struggle" as the elitist morons who govern us want to believe). Islamic history's violence and military conquests are described in the chapter "Jihad Through the Centuries." His conclusion to Part I states "Islam in the only religious doctrine in human history with a developed doctrine, theology and legal system of mandatory violence against unbelievers."

Part II - From Europa to Eurabia. Describes the damage done to Europe from allowing massive Muslim immigration. The terrorist acts in Amsterdam, London and Spain. Brussels, the new Medina, where EU members are exhorted to deal with the Islamic threat by pretending it doesn't exist, by censoring studies of Muslim crimes (like widespread rape) in Europe, and by funding mosques, being "more sensitive" to Islamic sensibilities (e.g. by creating speech codes), granting "affirmative action" to Muslims in Europe, and by criminalizing criticism against Islam or Muslim attitudes and behavior. Trifkovic concludes by stating that America needs Europe and saving the latter is well worth our time and trouble.

Part III - America - Insecure Homeland. The enemy inside the walls. How the White House and the liberal left delude themselves as to Islam's true nature. Muslim propaganda in the USA, including that of CAIR; radical Islam's partner in higher education, the traitors in Academia. Conclusion is that the anti-Jihad struggle is a propaganda war similar to the Cold War.

Part IV - Defense Abroad. The struggle against Islamic terror is a global issue that requires the US to make major adjustments of its global strategy. Democraticizing the Middle East may be a fool's errand; as long as the region is Islamic, Democracy will have little effect on the attitudes and violent culture of Islam. The US should support and not condemn Russia for its war on Chechnyan terrorism. The US should never take confidence in the loyalty or trustworthiness of Muslim "allies," particularly Turkey and Malaysia. Turkey should NOT be allowed into the European Union.

Part V - The Solution. The war against Jihad (he should have said "Islam") can and must be won. (1) We should spy on Muslims in our midst without restraint or apology as they represent a seditious ideology that is hostile to American interests and laws. (2) We should refuse or rescind citizenship to all Islamic activists and deport them. (3) We should profile like mad and ignore the hysteria of the idiot Left. Israel profiles with enthusiasm and without apology and it works, because of mathematical, statistical odds: a young Muslim man is literally tens of thousands of times more likely to carry out a terrorist attack in the United States than an Episcopalian, Roman Catholic, Orthodox Christian, a Jew, Hindu or Buddhist, or even a Lebanese or Palestinian Christian. To call this effective means of stopping terror "racism" is absurd. (4) We should refuse to grant security clearances to Muslims because their religion makes them untrustworthy. Muslim FBI agents, for example, have consistently refused to tape record conversations with terrorists because the latter are fellow Muslims. Muslims in the military is also a bad idea - for example, the Muslim US soldier in Kuwait who killed an officer with a grenade and wounded several soldiers. (5) Reform immigration laws to exclude Jihadists and secure US borders. (6) Supervise mosques and Islamic centers in the US. All sermons must be given in English and recorded. Any Cleric who advocates violence or discrimination against non-Muslims or women will be summarily deported.

Serge Trifkovic makes a lot of sense. We need not fight a lot of bloody wars against Islam, we need only to isolate it so it cannot hurt us. As Trifkovic says, "we need to get the US out of Mecca and Mecca out of the US." This won't happen until our leaders free themselves from their quagmire of self-delusion and wishful thinking and openly define the enemy as ISLAM. Only when we accurately define the problem will the solutions become obvious.

8 comments:

Shawn said...

Hi again--

I take it that you don't wish to respond to my response to your comments at zalandria.blogspot.com on my post "Lamentations of the Damned"?

Just curious,
Shawn

Stogie said...

Shawn, I will let you have the last word since it's your blog and you need all the help you can get.

Anonymous said...

Trifkovic's 'solution' isn't.

It's a series of defensive measures intended to minimise the attack within Dar-al-Harb, and as such is just a stopgap. The BNP in Britain has a program of similar measures for attempting to defend us against the fifth column Islamic onslaught of social, cultural and economic sabotage. It may delay the inevitable Islamisation of Europe for a while, but can't prevent it.

The best means of defense is attack. Dar-al-Harb needs to defend itself by taking the ideological war for civilisation into Dar-al-Islam by use of propaganda, subversion, cultural and memetic warfare or whatever means are effective.

It would also be sensible to seize the oilfields and so deprive Dar-al-Islam of its only source of wealth (they can't make anything that anyone else wants to buy). The oilfields are small in area and mostly near the sea. Long term military occupation would not be impossible.

Stogie said...

ROP, Trifkovic's ideas are worthy in many areas, particuarly stopping and reversing Muslim immigration into the West, finally openly defining who the enemy is, etc. It seems to me the biggest problem with Europe's impending downfall is not the Muslim immigrants, but the socialist/pacifist elitists who let them in and then protect them.

Seizing the oilfields sounds very tempting and should certainly be an option. As far as I'm concerned, nothing is off the table in turning the tide of Muslim aggression.

Anonymous said...

Stogie said...
Shawn, I will let you have the last word since it's your blog and you need all the help you can get.

GOOD JOB ANSWERING THIS IDIOT. IF FACT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO EVER LEFT HIM A COMMENT. I BET HE ALMOST WET HIS PANTS HE WAS SO HAPPY!!!

Stogie said...

Oh well, let's cut Shawn some slack. He's probably just a college student whose head is being filled with liberal mush on a daily basis by his Marxist professors.

Ronbo said...

Good review!

I've posted a link to it from my Blog.

http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2006/05/final-solution-of-islam-problem.html

Anonymous said...

I really enjoyed looking at your site, I found it very helpful indeed, keep up the good work.
»