Stacey Dash is a very lovely, oh hell, I'll just say it -- SEXY-- actress, who recently endorsed Mitt Romney for president. The fact that she is of African heritage caused a firestorm of leftwing vitriol on Twitter, with death wishes, undisguised hatred and bigoted trash talk, once again exemplifying the highest thought and most cherished values of the Democratic Party.
In her endorsement, Stacey tweeted:
Vote for Romney. The only choice for your future.
Suffah suckahs. You be goin' down. Stacey's with us now, so curl up with your crack pipes and shut the hell up.
Read more about it here and here.
Showing posts with label Leftwing Slander. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leftwing Slander. Show all posts
Monday, October 08, 2012
Sunday, September 05, 2010
Left Is Again Smearing R.S. McCain
Last week Stacy McCain interviewed Todd Palin, husband of Sarah Palin, in Wasilla, Alaska. This was a big coup for Stacy, as Todd's wife Sarah is very popular among conservatives and Republicans.
Apparently, however, the Left has begun stating that, since Robert S. McCain is a "white supremacist" (he isn't), then Todd Palin and the Palin family must be aligned with "white supremacists." They are trying to damage the Palins by resurrecting an old, disproven lie about Stacy McCain.
It is really a crude smear by association, and in this case, even the association is false.
McCain is smart not to jump through a thousand hoops trying to prove he is not a "white supremacist," because the more he protests, the more publicity he gives to the smear.
The Left really doesn't care if the slander is true or not. To them, there is no truth or falsity, no ethics, no morality: there is only winning elections. Democrat strategy would make Machiavelli blush.
See McCain's article on this latest smear here.
Apparently, however, the Left has begun stating that, since Robert S. McCain is a "white supremacist" (he isn't), then Todd Palin and the Palin family must be aligned with "white supremacists." They are trying to damage the Palins by resurrecting an old, disproven lie about Stacy McCain.
It is really a crude smear by association, and in this case, even the association is false.
McCain is smart not to jump through a thousand hoops trying to prove he is not a "white supremacist," because the more he protests, the more publicity he gives to the smear.
The Left really doesn't care if the slander is true or not. To them, there is no truth or falsity, no ethics, no morality: there is only winning elections. Democrat strategy would make Machiavelli blush.
See McCain's article on this latest smear here.
Saturday, April 03, 2010
The False Analogy of the New York Times: Tea Party Members vs Weather Underground
American Power has a post regarding a recent article by the New York Times. The article compares the violent, anti-American, pro-Communist Weather Underground of the 1960's with the Tea Party goers of 2010.
There is no comparison and the Times knows it, but this is not news reporting, it is leftwing propaganda. It is part of the ongoing effort of the so-called mainstream news to discredit and defame the Tea Party movement.
The Tea Parties are trying to save America, not destroy it or subvert it to some foreign, totalitarian ideology, as did the Weather Underground. Further, the Tea Parties have shown ZERO tendencies towards violence in their numerous assemblies and protests. They have threatened no one. They have slandered no one -- not minorities or gays. Their only threat, if it can be called one, is to vote the Democrats out in mass, come November.
The Times story is disgusting and dishonest. That's probably one of the reasons they are skating on the thin edge of bankruptcy. May it come soon.
There is no comparison and the Times knows it, but this is not news reporting, it is leftwing propaganda. It is part of the ongoing effort of the so-called mainstream news to discredit and defame the Tea Party movement.
The Tea Parties are trying to save America, not destroy it or subvert it to some foreign, totalitarian ideology, as did the Weather Underground. Further, the Tea Parties have shown ZERO tendencies towards violence in their numerous assemblies and protests. They have threatened no one. They have slandered no one -- not minorities or gays. Their only threat, if it can be called one, is to vote the Democrats out in mass, come November.
The Times story is disgusting and dishonest. That's probably one of the reasons they are skating on the thin edge of bankruptcy. May it come soon.
Labels:
Leftwing Slander,
New York Times,
New York Times,
Tea Parties
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Is Rachel Maddow a Crack Whore? Some Say She Is, and I Believe She Is.
The very masculine (yet allegedly female) Rachel Maddow (photo left) of far-left MSNBC called R.S. McCain a "white supremacist" on the air this morning. She was discussing Sarah Palin's new book "Going Rogue," which was ghost-authored by Lynn Vincent, who also co-authored "Donky Cons" with Stacy McCain. Due to this tenuous and very dubious connection, Sarah Palin must therefore be a "white supremacist" -- or so Rachael Maddow would have you believe. One can expect this kind of extremist language from hippie-burnout and has-been Charles Johnson, but it is much more repugnant to hear it from a mainstream media pundit. This isn't reasoned debate, it is verbal terrorism.
I have spent a lot of time thoroughly refuting these slanders against R.S. McCain, having actually observed him in debate against racists and defending racial equality. I won't repeat them at this time -- search my blog if you are interested.
Maddow's despicable comments constitute liberal slander on steroids. Rachel Maddow stated that McCain is "widely believed to be, and I believe him to be, a white supremacist." Apparently, no actual facts, evidence or proof are needed to slander someone on MSNBC, as long as one "believes" the slander to be true.
So with that said, let's apply Rachel's despicable reporting standards to Rachel. "Rachel Maddow is widely believed to be, and I believe her to be, a crack whore." Therefore, Sarah Palin's book was criticized on the air by a crack whore. Are you going to believe a crack whore? Especially one who looks like your younger brother? Of course not.
Donald Douglas has more on Maddow's slander here.
Bob Belvedere at Camp of the Saints weighs in here.
Stacy McCain is out of town but Smitty says RSM will have more to say when he returns.
Update: Chris Muir of "Day by Day" Cartoons weighs in on Stacy's side!
I have spent a lot of time thoroughly refuting these slanders against R.S. McCain, having actually observed him in debate against racists and defending racial equality. I won't repeat them at this time -- search my blog if you are interested.
Maddow's despicable comments constitute liberal slander on steroids. Rachel Maddow stated that McCain is "widely believed to be, and I believe him to be, a white supremacist." Apparently, no actual facts, evidence or proof are needed to slander someone on MSNBC, as long as one "believes" the slander to be true.
So with that said, let's apply Rachel's despicable reporting standards to Rachel. "Rachel Maddow is widely believed to be, and I believe her to be, a crack whore." Therefore, Sarah Palin's book was criticized on the air by a crack whore. Are you going to believe a crack whore? Especially one who looks like your younger brother? Of course not.
Donald Douglas has more on Maddow's slander here.
Bob Belvedere at Camp of the Saints weighs in here.
Stacy McCain is out of town but Smitty says RSM will have more to say when he returns.
Update: Chris Muir of "Day by Day" Cartoons weighs in on Stacy's side!
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Must Read: The Destruction of Sarah Palin
Bill Whittle of PJTV and the blog "Eject Eject Eject" has a great article on the Left's planned destruction of Sarah Palin. You can read it or watch Bill's video.Bill says what I have said on this blog several times: the Left files bogus ethics complaints against Palin for two reasons: (1) to destroy her financially through the huge legal fees needed to defend herself and (2) to poison the well of public opinion with an implication of wrong-doing. If every time you hear Palin on the news channel and hear "ethics charges" mentioned in the same sentence, your subconscious will pick up the intended message. It is really dirty politics, but that's what the Left is all about.
Whittle says that we must begin employing the same tactics against the Left as a form of retaliation. I reluctantly agree. It goes against the grain for most conservatives to resort to dirty fighting, but the Machiavellian Dems allow us no other options. We must give them full measure of what they have given to us.
Perhaps our first Fight Back strategy is to identify Democratic politicians in the state of Alaska for targeting with bogus ethics complaints. Our Alaskan operatives can file complaints on the lack of ethics in their neckties, or for wearing plaid, thereby violating fashion ethics. Any Dems who have dyed their hair to hide the gray could be targeted for lack of ethics in personal grooming. We could state that the Dem politicians have attempted to enrich themselves through their political offices...by accepting salaries. All of our complaints will be quickly denied and thrown out, but not until the Dems have incurred substantial legal fees. Whoops, there goes Junior's college fund or mom's retirement account. Oh well.
Of course, we don't have the leftwing mainstream media to assist in the effort, like the Associated Press, who falsely reported Palin was guilty of the last ethics charge, filed about a week ago.
Nevertheless, we will do our best. Hope you Alaskan Democrats have your checkbooks ready; your attorneys will be needing retainers soon.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Pamela Geller on the Sarah Palin Haters
Pamela Geller has just posted an excellent article on the lunatic left's rabid hatred of Sarah Palin, most recently expressed in hateful, Photoshopped pictures of Palin's infant son, Trig Palin.The terrible argument the lefties are using to justify their disgraceful behavior is to say that Palin made Trig "fair game" by bringing him on stage at the Republican National Convention. They say she herself made Trig a tool of political propaganda and can't now complain about the Photoshops. Liberals are very good at making up ridiculous arguments on the fly to support their grossly immoral, anti-human and anti-American behavior.
Geller points out, however, that Barack Obama brought his two young daughers on stage at the Democratic Convention. Does that make the little girls "fair game" for slander and ridicule?
Don't worry, those little girls are safe. We on the Right represent civilization; it is the Left that represents barbarism, nihilism and rabid hatred -- to the point of attacking infant children with disabilities.
Why does the Left hate Sarah Palin with such wild abandon? Because Sarah Palin is pretty, useful, wholesome and NORMAL. And they're not.
Via Atlas Shrugs
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

