Liberal websites rely on a fraudulent list of "fourteen attributes of fascism" that was written by a Democrat, one Laurence Britt, during the 2004 election cycle. It was never intended to be a scholarly analysis of fascism, but only a partisan political argument against the Bush Administration. (Read more about it here.) Nevertheless, this phony and biased "list" is widely disseminated even today by leftists and liberal writers and bloggers, as if it were real and accurate. They usually describe it this way:
Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, published research on fascism in which he examined the fascist regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each fascist State.
Note that Laurence Britt (note proper spelling) was neither a doctor nor a political scientist, and his list was not derived from any analysis of past fascistic regimes. Here are his 14 phony attributes (with my comments in red):
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism – Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. [So if you are patriotic and fly the flag, you might be a fascist. According to this definition, the former Soviet Union, Red China and North Korea are fascists too.]2. Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights – Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarceration of prisoners, etc. [Waterboarding is allegedly torture, therefore Bush was a fascist because he used it on captured terrorists. The "long incarceration of prisoners" is probably a dig at Gitmo and its residents.]
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause – The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc. [So any concerns over an external threat like radical Islam or Communist aggression makes you a fascist. However, a "frenzy" over the non-existent threat of domestic, right-wing terrorists is okay, even supported by Big Sis of Homeland Security. How about the "unifying cause" of non-existent global warming and its pending destruction of the human race?]
4. Supremacy of the Military – Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military are glamorized. [That's why we fascist Republicans want a strong military instead of spending all that dough on transforming the ghettos into the City of Oz.]
5. Rampant sexism – The government of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution. [The last sentence describes key liberal agendas and makes the bias of the author transparently obvious. Quite a few of the Nazi regime were blatant homosexuals (see here). As for abortion, Although the Nazis banned abortion for Aryan women, they enthusiastically peddled and promoted abortion for non-Aryans. In fact, the Nazis mandated legalized abortion in several European countries where it had never been legal before (see here). It is utter nonsense to assert that if you oppose abortion, i.e. the extermination of the helpless unborn, you are a fascist.]
6. Controlled Mass Media – Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common. [Hmm, I agree with this one. It clearly describes the mainstream media and their slavish support of Democrats and Barack Obama. As for "censorship in wartime," FDR did plenty of that and I don't disagree with it.]
7. Obsession with National security – Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. [You mean like fear of the Tea Party? Fear of "racists" (see the Southern Poverty Law Center)? Fear of non-existent "right wing" domestic terrorists?]
8. Religion and Government are intertwined – Government in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions. [This is B.S., another obvious play to the liberal bias against religious conservatives. The French Jacobins, fascists in the true sense of the word, hated religion and executed priests. Hitler hated Christianity and Nazis were pagans, vegetarians and occultists. Benito Mussolini was an atheist.]
9. Corporate Power is Protected – The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation are often the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. [This is almost accurate. In fascism, there is a strong partnership between the government and major corporations, but it is false to say the latter put the former into power. Labor Unions probably have more power to effect elections than corporations today. Government grants benefits and power to those corporations who support its goals, shields those corporations from competition or gives those corporations monopolies over various economic activity. In turn, the corporations require their employees to also support government goals, memes and beliefs. See the Wilson Administration, e.g. "We do our part."]
10. Labor Power is suppressed – Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated, or are severely restricted. [Another self-serving but inaccurate definition. Hitler didn't banish labor unions, as the left has disingenuously asserted; he brought them into the Nazi movement by creating the German Labor Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF), which was comprised of two primary entities, the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. Benito Mussolini, leader of fascist Italy, was a union activist who was expelled from Trentino province for his union activities.]
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts – Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked. [Brazen nonsense. Hitler originally aspired to be an artist, and the Nazis stole great art from the nations they conquered. They used artistic displays and statuary to glorify Aryan man. Mussolini celebrated and supported Italian artists. It would be more accurate to say that fascism loves art, especially art that justifies, glorifies and rationalizes its political goals. As for education, higher and otherwise, fascists supported education, particularly as a means of indoctrinating students in its goals and philosophy, much as is the case on leftist controlled campuses today.]
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment – Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations. [The first sentence is accurate, the second is liberal propaganda. Under fascist regimes, the people do not have the option to "forego civil liberties" since they aren't given that as a choice.]
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption – Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. [I know of no historical examples that would make cronyism a trait limited to fascists. It is true of any and all governments, including that of Barack Obama. As for massive governmental theft, I know of no better example than our system of taxation and "redistribution of wealth."]
14. Fraudulent Elections – Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassinations of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections. [This was probably a reference to Bush's alleged theft of the 2000 election, when the Supreme Court ruled against the Democratic Party of Florida. In actuality, the left now controls the mainstream media to an extreme degree, and Democrat judges often overturn the results of elections that they do not approve of -- like those outlawing Sharia law or prohibiting gay marriage.]
In a later post I will attempt to provide a more concise and accurate description of what fascism really was and is.
8 comments:
Hitler was thoroughly a man of the Left. Gub'ment uber alles!
Hmm, let's see.
"Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in
fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in
certain cases because of 'need.'”
"Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in
other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government
regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives."
"Government in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion." Or the richest and most influential religion.
"The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation are often
the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually
beneficial business/government relationship and power elite."
"It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or
even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly
attacked." If you're an academic and believe in human biodiversity or even the existence of races, don't expect your free speech to be tolerated.
"The police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people
are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil
liberties in the name of patriotism." Or security.
"Groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government
positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their
friends from accountability."
"Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times
elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even
assassinations of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control
voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the
media." Except when the media are subservient and willingly support office holders and parties without being manipulated.
Thank goodness we live in a country where we don't have to worry about fascism.
Liberty, yes he was!
Rick, the progressive movement is very similar to historic fascism: a top-down, coercive government that reaches into every aspect of human life, where a conformity of beliefs and behavior is enforced, where the individual is subordinated to the state. I'll write more about this later.
It's a complicated subject and on a couple of measures Hitker was in fact not a man of the left. But I'll look forward to your updates Stogie.
What measures were those?
Well, remember that ideology can be understand as one's orientation toward progress. Nazism was reactionary in seeking to restore a pure version of Aryan history in a new Third Reich. Sure, it was socialist, sure. But ideologically it was millenarian in seeking to restore some order of purity harking to an earlier time. That's the opposite of Marxism, which seeks a Utopian future of a communist state in which economic classes have been eliminated. Nazism posits racial purity as its supreme end, and the elevation on nation/patriotism as the key center of loyalty in the state. Jonah Goldberg's book probably messed up a lot of people on the left/right continuum. It's okay to say that the fascists/Nazis were on the extreme far right, simply because nothing in modern conservatism is remotely similar. But we may disagree. I mention this only from long readings in political science, most of which is quite divorced from the partisan debates over socialism we have today.
Donald, yes there are some notable differences between Fascism and Communism, namely, that Fascism was nationalistic and Communism international. The former was concerned with their own people and nation, and the latter wished to spread their ideology over the entire globe. Both fascism and communism are utopian, there is no difference there. Fascism, like Communism, sought to eliminate class differences -- again, no difference. Hitler's version of fascism is not the ultimate definition of fascism, because a lot of the Nazi goals and programs were unique to Hitler and Germany. For example, antisemitism is not inherent to fascism -- neither Mussolini nor Franco persecuted Jews, in fact, both protected Jews and had Jews in their governments. Fascism is not inherently in favor of racial purity, that was a Nazi characteristic, peculiar to Germany.
I disagree very strongly that there is anything about the Nazis that would be considered rightist or similar to modern conservative ideology. Jonah Goldberg's book clarified a number of misconceptions in this regard. Fascists were totalitarian socialists who competed with Communists for the same constituents. To argue that fascists are "right wing" is to argue that the more one opposes unlimited government, the more he supports it. The argument and definition make no sense.
Post a Comment