1. That homosexuality is a perversion as that term is defined. Therefore, those who want to attach that label to the condition are correct. [Many if not most people who apply that term to gays, do so as a derogatory expression. Their intent is to wound rather than to be linguistically precise.]
2. That homosexuality appears to be inborn and involuntary, and therefore persecution of homosexuals accomplishes nothing. [This is my position exactly. Persecution of gays only creates more Democrats, and nothing else. Many who dispute that homosexuality is in-born do so to preserve their prejudices.]
3. That homosexuality is a defect, not a cause for celebration. McCaw writes:
[Again, this is my position exactly.]
I am paraphrasing McCaw above, so do read her article, here.
Taki Magazine has been routinely excoriated by the leftist gatekeepers of our culture, and those who write articles for it slammed as racists and bigots. For that reason, I avoided it for many years, but today I linked to the magazine. I will continue to disagree with some of its paleoconservative views (because they resemble liberalism to me), but Taki Magazine has much to offer for anyone in pursuit of truth, logic and common sense.