ISIS Is The True Face of Islam: Pure Evil

ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria,  is absolutely brutal, ruthless, merciless.  This military style force has taken over large parts of both Syria and Iraq.  Their goal is to restore the Islamic Caliphate.  The Caliphate was formed after Muhammad's death, a kind of Islamic Papacy, that rules over all Muslims worldwide.  It existed for many decades, until it was dissolved after World War I.  However, Muslims want it back.

ISIS has been executing Christians, Shiite Muslims, Kurds and Yazidis for some time now.  They behead many, crucify others, and shoot many more.  They are pure evil, but they are the true face of Islam.  They are merely following the example of their "prophet," Muhammad, who was also a ruthless, murdering megalomaniac who committed similar atrocities in the name of his "religion."

Yesterday a YouTube video came to light with the title "A Message To America," showing the beheading murder of American journalist, James Wright Foley.  These sub-humans seem to think that such atrocities will strike fear into our hearts and make us stop all opposition to their evil.  It will have the opposite effect.  In light of such barbaric mass murder, our determination to wipe out ISIS grows stronger daily.  Jihadis must die, all of them, without exception.

I wanted US troops out of Iraq.  Now I want them back in.  Not to make democrats out of the Shiites, but to kill ISIS, wipe them out to the last man.  They say they love death.  Let's give it to them.

The Fruits of Islam: Dead Bodies

Muslims have bombed a church in Pakistan, killing around 70 people.

The Islamic slaughter continues, yet liberal idiots still fret over "Islamophobia."

Wherever evil exists, you will find liberals defending it.

See more here.  The death toll has now reached 81.  It's way past time to punish the jihadis in highly painful ways -- the destruction of their mosques and madrassas, for instance.

BOYCOTT CPAC!

Always on Watch has a post this morning about the leftward drifting CPAC, formerly known as the Conservative Political Action Committee, now known as the jihad-enabling, terrorist-ignoring, PC endorsing clusterfuck.

It seems that Robert Spencer won an award in a poll that showed his site "Jihad Watch" to be the most popular blog, by far, among conservatives.  The award was to be presented to the winner at next week's annual meeting of CPAC in Washington, DC.  However, since CPAC is now headed up by Muslim apologist and sympathizer, Grover Norquist, Spencer was informed that he could only be given the award by promising not to criticize Norquist or his Muslim wife, Suhail Khan.

Spencer refused, and is now barred from accepting the award.  Read about it here.

CPAC has now become one of those "proper" conservative organizations (like National Review Online) that is heavily influenced and intimidated by liberal nostrums and bugaboos, ready to throw any conservative under the bus for not self-censoring truth in order to achieve a faux patina of social propriety.

Boycott CPAC.  Don't go, don't participate, and do not fund the organization.

Pamela Geller Schools Erin Burnett of CNN on the Meaning of Jihad

Pamela Geller of the blog Atlas Shrugs has been fighting in San Francisco and New York to have her anti-jihadi ads approved for the bus systems there.  Anti-semitic and pro-Muslim ads are accepted, but Geller's ads were rejected.  Pamela sued both cities and won the right to run the ads.

Lawrence Auster comments on this important victory at View From the Right:

A victory for truth

Pamela Geller has won her fight to post the following advertisement on New York City subways and buses:

In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.

The first sentence is a paraphrase of something once said by Ayn Rand. We discussed the battle over the same ad in San Francisco mass transit here.

Geller’s attorney in these important court cases is David Yerushalmi, who was one of the speakers at Geller’s conference last week.

 The Other McCain has run a video of Geller being interviewed by Erin Burnett of CNN on the controversy. Burnett is an infuriating, liberal tool, and like most useful idiots, she runs interference for evil, all while posing as a pillar of wisdom, morality and rectitude.  Burnett's attitude seems particularly asinine, considering all the Muslim violence that has been directed at the west since 911, including the murder of our ambassador to Libya only last week.  But what's more important, really -- whether Erin Burnett gets invited to the next snobby liberal cocktail party, or whether more Israelis, Americans and others are murdered by Islamic jihad?  Ah, those of us who know the ethical and moral depth of liberalism don't even have to ask.

Paul and Pape's Fraudulent Argument: Islamic Violence Not Caused by Islam

Ron Paul's belief is that murderous and genocidal actions by Muslims worldwide are the result of western actions, not the tenets of the Islamic faith.  Ron Paul wrote:

Though it is hard for many to believe, honest studies show that the real motivation behind the Sept. 11 attacks and the vast majority of other instances of suicide terrorism is not that our enemies are bothered by our way of life. Neither is it our religion, or our wealth. Rather, it is primarily occupation. …

On this point, Ron Paul is full of it up to his ears.  Joel Richardson of WND opines:

...despite the allure of Paul’s constitutional convictions, his perspectives on United States foreign policy, radical Islam and the nation of Israel are an absolute deal breaker. Paul’s emphatic trademark claim that the present rise of Islamic terrorism globally is the result of “blowback” from American actions abroad is nothing less than ridiculous and an absolute insult to my intelligence.

According to Paul, radical Muslims are not radical because they have drunk deeply from the trough of an expansionist, racist and murderous ideology, but rather because American actions abroad have brought about the natural response of resistance.

 Richardson blames a Paul advisor, Robert Pape for this fraudulent argument.  Pape claims in his book "Cutting the Fuse" that 95% of terrorist attacks worldwide were a response to foreign occupation.   Richardson counters with his argument that Robert Pape is a pseudo-scholar whose claims have been refuted by other, real scholars.  Further, Pape has been found conspiring with CAIR to promote his book and his arguments.

I think the best refutation of Paul and Pape's argument comes from Lawrence Auster of View From the Right.  Auster writes:

I have written about Pape's fraudulent argument in the past. In December 2005, in a long discussion with a reader who was promoting Pape's ideas. I said:

Obviously, a Western presence in a Muslim country is going to exacerbate jihadist manifestations including suicide terrorism. That's why I'm against any involvement by us in the Muslim world and any efforts to reform it from within.

But when analysts detach from Islam phenomena that are obviously deeply tied to Islam, such as terrorism, we have a problem. This is what all the mainstream intellectuals do today. They say terrorism is due to some cultural or economic or political factor that is extrinsic to Islam, so if we just remove that extrinsic factor, the terrorism will stop. So if we assimilate the Muslims in Europe better, or if we stop "discriminating" against Muslims, or if we create a global Provider State to give Muslim countries food and schools and highways, or if we betray Israel to its mortal enemies, then terrorism will go away.

My point is that while we should not do unnecessary things that exacerbate jihadism, ultimately jihadism is an expression of Islam itself. As long as Islam exists, jihadism, along with the terrorism that Allah specifically orders in the Koran, will exist as well. Thus any writer who says that terrorism committed by Muslims is not connected with Islam is promoting a dangerous delusion. [Emphasis added].

My reading of Islamic literature and books on Islam revealed that, according to Muhammad, the only sure way for a Muslim to go to heaven is to die in jihad fighting against the infidel.  Without this, a devout Muslim's chances of making it to heaven are only one in one thousand.  Therefore, I believe that jihad against non-Muslims in Muslim countries is merely Muslims taking advantage of a religious opportunity:  they can secure their place in heaven attacking "infidels," even when the infidels were sent to their country to protect it, as we did in Saudi Arabia after Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

Islamic jihad is all about Islam and Muslim salvation; it is not Arabic nationalism.  The problem, reduced to its essence, is Islam itself.  Our best method of protecting ourselves from Islam is separation, i.e. stopping Islamic immigration into the west, developing energy independence, and ceasing the stupidity of "nation building" within the Islamic states.

South Park and the Prophet Muhammad: Jumpin' Jihad, Folks!

I found this South Park depiction of the Prophet Muhammad. Well NO WONDER the jihadis are all in a lather! This depiction of the Muslim prophet is truly outrageous and disgusting! Have these people NO SHAME?

Please write to South Park and let them know we are OUTRAGED at this SACRILEGIOUS depiction of Cartman as Muhammad!  Cartman WOULD NEVER dress so gay!

Islam, the religion of MUHAMMAD -- performing mass murder for 1400 years. Respect it. Or else.

Nidal Hasan Frequented Strip Clubs Before His Jihad

Rush just reported that Nidal Hasan frequented strip clubs in Texas in the weeks before his (alleged) shooting spree at Fort Hood.  The 9/11 hijackers did the same thing, some going to Las Vegas.

When a devout Muslim is about to die, why would he wallow in "sin" in such a blatant manner?  The answer is simple:  Islam teaches that a jihadi martyr is forgiven all sins at the first drop of his blood.  So sin, sin, sin and have a great time, martyrdom will erase those sins.

I wonder if the authorities have noted this sin phenomenon of would-be jihadi martyrs.  It would seem to me that an otherwise devout Muslim who starts frequenting strip clubs should be watched very carefully.


See a related post at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

Nidal Hasan, Fort Hood Shooter Suspect, Regains Consciousness

Michelle Malkin had it right in saying that, because of our press bias, we have to read foreign newspapers to learn what is going on in the Fort Hood case.  So I read the UK Times online and learned that Nidal Hasan has regained consciousness in his hospital room and is talking to medical staff.  He is now breathing on his own:  he was taken off the ventilator on Saturday.

Some of the most incredibly asinine statements are issuing forth from the mouth of the US Army Chief of Staff.  The UK Times reports:

General George Casey, the US Army Chief of Staff, warned against jumping too quickly to conclusions, saying that it was important for the country not to get caught up in speculation about Major Hasan’s Muslim faith. He revealed that he has instructed his commanders to be on the lookout for anti-Muslim reaction to the killings at the Texas post.

Focusing on the Islamic roots of the suspected gunman could “heighten the backlash" against all Muslims in the military, he said in interviews on TV networks ABC and CNN, adding that diversity in the military “gives us strength”.

This idiot ought to be fired.  "Diversity gives us strength" is such blatant horse puckey.   Does that mean the military would be stronger with Neo-Nazis, Marxists, Taliban, Wahabbis, cannibals, head hunters, and Aztec practitioners of human sacrifice?  Ridiculous.  It is exactly this PC attitude that prevented Hasan's army colleagues from reporting him.  Political correctness kills.

Diversity in skin color is irrelevant, and diversity of opinion as to the godliness of Jihad and killing for Allah is NOT A GOOD THING.  When it comes to critical subjects like loyalty to the United States, diversity is NOT A GOOD THING, particularly for members of the armed forces.

Read the article here, courtesy of the UK Times Online.

Last Practitioner of Jihad, John Allen Muhammad, Dies Tomorrow

John Allen Muhammad, one of the two beltway snipers who randomly murdered 10 people seven years ago, will be executed tomorrow.  Here's another guy with an Arabic name who revered Osama Bin Laden (see his drawing at right), extolled the way of Jihad and praised Allah.  The Religion of Malice was personified in these two cretins, a fact ignored (again) by the mainstream media. (See Lee Malvo's praise of Jihad in the written note below.  Malvo was only 17 at the time so was spared the death penalty.)

Per Wikipedia, Jihad was the reason for the mass murder.  They write:

A series of trial exhibits indicated that Malvo and Muhammad were motivated by an affinity for Islamic Jihad.

Exhibit 65-006: A self-portrait of Malvo in the cross hairs of a gun scope shouting, 'ALLAH AKBAR!' The word 'SALAAM' scrawled vertically. A lyric from Bob Marley's Natural Mystic 'Many more will have to suffer. Many more will have to die. Don't ask me why.'

Exhibit 65-016: A portrait of Saddam Hussein with the words 'INSHALLAH' and 'The Protector,' surrounded by rockets labeled 'chem' and 'nuk.'

Exhibit 65-043: Father and son portrait of Malvo and Muhammad. 'We will kill them all. Jihad.'

Exhibit 65-056: A self-portrait of Malvo as sniper, lying in wait, with his rifle. 'JIHAD' written in bold letters.

Exhibit 65-067: A suicide bomber labeled 'Hamas' walking into a McDonald's restaurant. Another drawing of the Twin Towers burning captioned: '85 percent chance Zionists did this.' More scrawls: 'ALLAH AKBAR,' 'JIHAD' and 'Islam will explode.'

Exhibit 65-103: A lion accompanies chapter and verse from the Koran ('Sura 2:190'): 'Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you and slay them wherever ye catch them.'

Exhibit 65-109: Portrait of Osama bin Laden, captioned 'Servant of Allah.'

Exhibit 65-117: The White House drawn in crosshairs, surrounded by missiles, with a warning: 'Sep. 11 we will ensure will look like a picnic to you' and 'you will bleed to death little by little.'

Exhibit 65-101: Malvo's thought for the day: 'Islam the only true guidance, the way of peace.'"

Tomorrow however, Allah's servant John Allen Muhammad will be strapped to a gurney in a Virginia prison and it will be lights out for the beltway sniper.  For some strange reason, however, Muhammad doesn't appear anxious to reap his 72 virgins and frolic with Allah in the Garden of Erotic Delights:  he has been appealing his conviction and pressing for a stay of execution.  Perhaps he is rethinking this whole martyrdom thing.  If so, it's a bit too late for that, Muhammad.  Salaam!

Muslim Extremists: Kick The Bums Out

A few weeks ago I got into a big fight with a group of UCLA college students. They claimed that I was writing my own version of Mein Kampf by calling for the cessation of Islamic immigration into the West and by persuading others to leave.

I rebutted their juvenile ignorance in this post:

Saber Point: The Ignorance and Arrogance of Certain UCLA College Kids.

The whole point of my position, and that of other writers like Serge Trifkovic and Lawrence Auster is that it is insanity to import large numbers of hostile, unassimilable Muslims who do not share our liberal standards of tolerance, democracy and freedom. Yes, many Muslims are peaceful but not many are enthusiastic about liberal democracies, and there will always be a violent minority who wish to follow the express teachings of Muhammad, i.e. to conduct jihad against the West. Today we have yet another confirmation of this fact with the arrest of the six Jihadis planning to attack Fort Dix in New Jersey:

The defendants, all men in their 20s from the former Yugoslavia and the Middle East, include a pizza deliveryman suspected of using his job to scout out the military base.

Their goal was "to kill as many American soldiers as possible" with mortars, rocket-propelled grenades and guns, prosecutors said.

"Today we dodged a bullet. In fact, when you look at the type of weapons that this group was trying to purchase, we may have dodged a lot of bullets," said FBI agent J.P. Weis.

"We had a group that was forming a platoon to take on an army. They identified their target, they did their reconnaissance. They had maps. And they were in the process of buying weapons. Luckily we were able to stop that."

So UCLA college kiddies, what do you have to say about that?

The problem, not understood by UCLA students and other liberals, is that Islam really is a violent and intolerant ideology. Muslims look to the example of the "Prophet," Muhammad, who was a very violent man. He once attacked and captured a settlement of Jews. When they surrendered, he had all the men beheaded (about 800 of them), then joined in a massive rape of their widows, daughters and sisters. The Muslims kept whatever women they wanted as sex slaves, and sold the rest with the children into slavery.

Besides that old Mo regularly had people assassinated who criticized him, including several poets. He robbed caravans, held captured hostages for ransom, and attacked various tribes and villages strictly for the plunder. He was one bad dude, totally convinced that God's major goal in life was to satisfy all of his passions and lusts for sex, power and treasure.

Next, Muslims who want to be violent need only read the Qur'an and the Haddiths, the sacred texts of Islam. Old bloody Mo commanded unceasing Jihad against all the peoples of the earth until all were either Muslims, slaves (dhimmis) or dead. Further, Mo stated that the only sure path to Heaven was to die in Jihad, fighting the "Infidels." Over the centuries millions of "Infidels" have died as a result. Mo's commandment was the reason behind 9/11, behind the Muslim atrocities that occur daily around the world, whether in Darfur, India, Thailand, Malaysia or the Middle East.

Mo is the reason 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered in Turkey in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Ever hear of the Armenian Genocide? You probably have, but where have you ever read that it was caused by Islamic intolerance of the Christian Armenians, based on the teachings of Muhammad? Well now you have, because that genocide was just one of many committed by Islam down through the centuries. The Crusades were merely a defensive response to Muslim aggression; as such, they were too little, too late.

Now I don't know about you UCLA college kiddies, but having the Qur'an and the Jihad commandment as a "sacred text" kind of bothers me. Good Muslims kill people as a sacred duty. In fact, Old Mo told his minions to behead us infidels. That's the major reason we got to see those videos from the Middle East of "Infidels" being beheaded - like Daniel Pearl and Nick Berg. The bloody bastards doing the deed weren't "corrupting" Islam, they were following it to the letter. They were just being "good" Muslims.

As such, I'd prefer they practice their religion elsewhere. If that makes me "Hitler," well Seig Heil, baby. But it doesn't. Hitler loved the Muslims and they loved him. They both loved killing people, especially Jews.

What do UCLA and other college kiddies like? Posing and posturing as enlightened liberals against the forces of darkness, bigotry and intolerance (except, or course, for intolerance directed at Americans). It is some sort of coming-of-age ritual among the members of their Tribe, more a cultural phenomenon than a thought process. They will continue their righteous dance for multiculturalism no matter how many American lives it may ultimately take.

Image Credit: The Study of Revenge Blog.