Tuesday, January 01, 2013

New York Times Op-Ed Raises Some Interesting Possibilities for Conservatives

Some forward thinker at the New York Times has written an op-ed column stating that it is time to get rid of the U.S. Constitution.  Then and only then can progressives carry out plans to turn the once greatest nation in the world into a banana republic and socialist tyranny.

The great thinker in question, one Louis Michael Seidman, writes:
As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is. Imagine that after careful study a government official — say, the president or one of the party leaders in Congress — reaches a considered judgment that a particular course of action is best for the country. Suddenly, someone bursts into the room with new information: a group of white propertied men who have been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves might have disagreed with this course of action. Is it even remotely rational that the official should change his or her mind because of this divination?
Hey, Seditious Seidman may have a point.  How many times have you wanted to firebomb the presses of the New York Times?  Unfortunately, there's this pesky First Amendment that makes it illegal.  With no more Constitution, we can exercise lawless, mob action to do what is undoubtedly correct:  shutting up the traitors among us.

Some other possibilities:
  1. Making it illegal for anyone to be a leftist.
  2. Outlawing the Democrat Party.
  3. Outlawing labor unions.
  4. Licensing all print and broadcast media and enforcing a code of conduct, i.e., to promote, support and celebrate capitalism, traditional marriage, free markets, laissez-faire economics, and to oppose, denigrate and ridicule socialism, collectivism, and smelly hippies.  Those who fail to support the code of conduct will have their licenses to publish canceled and subject to arrest and summary execution.
  5. Mass firing of all college professors who are leftists, communists, Marxists, progressives or Democrats (I realize that those categories widely overlap).  Michael Savage will be appointed education czar and will have the responsibility of hiring all university professors.
  6. Mass deportation of all Muslims and illegal immigrants.
  7. Outlawing rap music.
  8. Outlawing facial studs and tattoos.
  9. Legally recognizing abortion as murder and practitioners thereof subject to summary execution.
There's a point to my madness.  The Constitution even protects the unworthy, like Seidman and the publishers of the New York Times.

And now a warning to "progressives" everywhere:  We will fight in the streets, if necessary, to preserve the Constitution.  We do not accept the seditious transformation of our country into a socialist tyranny.  Do not underestimate us.


Rick Darby said...

(This disappeared in a Disqus outage. I apologize for the double posting if it eventually reappears.)

Okay, Brainbox Seidman, let's scupper the Constitution starting with the First Amendment.

It is now illegal to use the words or phrases racist, redneck, far right, fascist, and white privilege. Also banned are undocumented immigrant, migrant, progressive, compassionate, "for the children." All articles about violent criminals or suspects must give the race of the person in question.

Articles appearing in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post must be accompanied by a rebuttal of at least the same length.

We could go on about freedom of the press, but apparently Brainbox Seidman dislikes the Constitution in toto. Out goes the slaveholders' prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. (We're well on the way anyhow.) Once his wish is granted, we send a SWAT team to Brainbox's upper Fifth Avenue condo. Let's see what's under the sweaters in his dresser drawer. Let's confiscate his suits and bank and brokerage accounts via RICO and make him sue to get them back.

Even if the majority of Americans don't hold with Brainbox's reasoning, we could make a special exemption for him to express our esteem.

bro said...

Good start brother

Stogie Chomper said...

Sounds good to me, Rick.

Stogie said...

Thanks Bro

Stogie said...

Thanks Bro

Anonymous said...

These are basically short phrase loans that do produce you meet your fiscal troubles inside a preferred certain time
period. Thinking of time limitations these loans are especially created above an obligation totally free platform.

As such, these are kept absolutely no cost from credential checksums.
Problems such as defaults, arrears, bankruptcy, CCJs and even IVAs are not deemed right here.
Additional, there are also no collaterals connected with
these loans. There is minimal paper work required on the aspect of borrower.
There are also no hidden or extra documentation or faxing needed right here.
Applying for these loans is also very practical.

People merely need filling an over the internet form and when this gets authorized money is received inside 24 hours time frame.
These loans are frequently provided under convenient terms and conditions.
The basic simple applicant criteria right here is that they
must be a UK resident and of 18 years of age.
Feel free to visit my blog post http://dzikidzik.cba.pl/node/2734

Always On Watch said...

Seidman is a professor of Constitutional law at Georgetown University, isn't he?

People pay BIG BUCKS to attend that prestigious school (which also "gave" us Sandra Fluke, BTW).

Anonymous said...

These are fundamentally short term loans that do deliver you meet your
fiscal difficulties within a desired certain time period.
Considering time limitations these loans are particularly intended above an obligation cost-free platform.
As such, these are kept entirely no cost from credential checksums.
Concerns such as defaults, arrears, bankruptcy, CCJs and even IVAs are not thought to be here.
Further, there are also no collaterals connected with these loans.
There is minimal paper operate required on the component of borrower.

There are also no hidden or further documentation or
faxing required here. Applying for these loans is also especially practical.

Men and women just call for filling an on line form and once this gets authorized cash is received inside 24 hours time frame.
These loans are normally provided beneath handy terms and conditions.
The common fundamental applicant criteria right here is that they should certainly be a UK resident and of 18 years of age.
Stop by my web site ... www.city-kuechen.de

Stogie Chomper said...

Academia is one of the main sources of sedition in this country today. Mainstream media is another. No surprise that they teamed up to disseminate this garbage.

Stogie Chomper said...

Thanks Bro.