T-Shirt Describes Obama Supporters' True Goal

Here's a picture of an Obama supporter at a campaign rally, wearing a scandalous T-Shirt that tells the true goals of Obama and his supporters.

I am just shocked and sickened by the brazenness of it all.  I am sure you will be too.

Feel free to repost, republish and pass it along to Facebook, email and other means of dissemination.

UPDATE:  I have been advised that the image on the left has been Photoshopped. (I know. I Photoshopped it myself.)

If the left is going to put out false images in order to slander Republicans, then I will respond tit for tat to every one.  The original leftist propaganda photo can be viewed here.  Leftists are republishing their fake photo with glee, as it reinforces their slanderous meme about  why people support Romney over Obama.  (It isn't because they've been out of work for four years and lost the house.  It's because...Obama has a tan.  But you knew that.)

Reasons why the original photo is fake:  the slogans on T shirts are generally on the front, not the back of the shirt.  Further, the liberal sites who published the original photo did not identify or interview the man wearing the shirt, which indicates they are aware that the man was an agent provocateur, a false flag, a liberal posing as a "racist" conservative for propaganda purposes.  Several of these fakes have been exposed at Tea Party events, and the left's brazen dishonesty is nothing new.

But two can play at that game, kids.  Psy-ops work both ways.  Now I need some ideas for some new "faux" liberal t shirt slogans.  Something like this:

• Reproductive Rights!  Abort the Little Bastards!  (Maybe include an image of a fetus with a red circular "No" sign superimposed.)
• Drag Queens for Obama
• Give Marxism a Chance
• Jobs Are Overrated
• Free Drugs Now!
• High Gas Prices: A Must for the Environment
• High Food Prices Are Good for Your Figure
• Tax the Rich Til They Bleed!

Your suggestions are welcome.

More Fauxtography from Our Islamic Friends

I found this news photograph at Power Line. The Associated Press caption reads: A Palestinian woman reacts over relatives moments after they were killed in an Israeli missile strike outside their home in Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip,Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009. Five Palestinians were killed in the strike, Palestinian medical sources said.
..
Isn't it amazing that the photographer was right there and wasn't even harmed by the bomb that "killed" these Palestinians? What a great photographer he must be! He was able to perfectly frame the shot and snap the photo just as the woman reacts to finding her "family" members "killed." Just as amazing are her nice hair-do, earrings and clothing. Obviously she likes to dress nice in the midst of a war, even forgoing the usual chador or veil.

You can bet that two seconds after he snapped the photo the two fakers pretending to be dead got up and asked, "Did you get it? Should we do it again?"
.
The "Palestinians" are famous for posed and faked photography to use as propaganda that the mainstream media so willingly desseminates. This fake photography has become so well known and documented in the blogosphere that it has taken on the name of "fauxtography."

And what if the photo turns out to be a rare real photograph? Well then, those who live by the bomb quite probably will die by the bomb.
..
Perhaps we can use this photo for a "caption that photo" contest. My choice: "What?? Are you bums drunk AGAIN??

Fun With Photoshop: the Iranian Missiles

The Iranians released an obviously altered photograph of their much criticized missile launch this week. They apparently copied one of the missles and then pasted it into the picture to make their three missiles look like four missiles. I have posted their fake photo here (1) with the obvious copied parts outlined in red.















The second photo is the first one re-Photoshopped by myself. It took me five minutes to disguise the copied smoke plume, but apparently the Iranians aren't smart enough to do that themselves. Had they done so, their fake photograph might have escaped detection. See Photo 2.


















The third photo shows the actual launch as it happened. The Iranian missiles are flying off course because of their seriously deficient guidance systems! Well actually, this one is another Stogie photoshop. But don't tell the Iranians.

Feel free to reprint these photos if you wish.

Click on the photos to see them actual size.

A Biased Photo of Hillary Clinton

I found this over at Atlas Shrugs. Hillary Clinton was speaking at some political rally with a banner behind her with the word "Count," as in "Make your vote Count," or some such message.

An unfriendly photographer waited until she was in the correct position and snapped the picture. The word behind her now appears to be an appellation.

We understand that Barack Obama will be speaking at the Prickly Pear Convention later this week. I wonder what kind of tricky photo they will make of him, hmmmm?

When the Litigious Left Attacks

There were two disturbing occurrences in the blogosphere this week. A Jewish "rabbi" had his attorneys threaten to sue Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs for printing unpleasant truths about their Hamas-supporting, anti-american client, Michael E. Feinberg. That's him in the picture to the right, reacting to counter-demonstrators at a "peace" protest. Swell guy.

Feinberg's shysters have demanded removal of the critical material and a retraction on Pam's website. She responded by publishing even more unflattering facts about Feinberg, including pictures and videos. The above picture was one of them. Basically she says, "Sue me. I can hardly wait for the discovery phase." Rightist attorneys are already offering their services to Pam.

The second disturbing leftist attack was by the Associated Press on Brian Ledbetter, the owner of the website "Snapped Shot." The AP has threatened to sue for use of their copyrighted photos that appear frequently on the site. However, the AP photos probably fall under the "fair use" exceptions of the copyright law because Ledbetter publishes the photos to criticize them and show how biased they are. In a lawsuit Ledbetter might have a substantial chance of winning. But lawsuits are enormously expensive and time consuming and few ordinary citizens can afford the cost or time away from work. Bullies like the AP know this - they can afford it but know their critic cannot.

Why are AP and other news photos fair game for criticism? Because they can be used to deliberately create false impressions, and like an editorial that must be reprinted before it can be rebutted, offending photos must be republished.

A couple of cases in point are two photos published recently of Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, two opposing candidate for the Democrat presidential nomination. The mainstream press, which includes the AP, are supporting Obama. Or could you tell by looking at the photos on the left?

The Obama photo was taken when Obama's head was directly in front of a bright light, giving him a holy look, as if the light emanating around his head were from a halo. You can almost hear the heavenly chorus, can't you? No bias there.

The second photo was taken of Hillary as she spoke to a high school in the midwest. The high school's mascot is the Red Devil, the same name given to local miners who emerge from the mines covered in red clay. The photo was taken with the devil looking over her left shoulder and gives a very clear impression of evil.

So you have two examples of press misuse of photographs to make editorial statements, namely, that Obama is a saint who has come to save the world, and Hillary is evil and a companion of the devil.

This is why Snapped Shot had a legitimate mission in its fair use of AP photos for purposes of criticism - and it's also the reason the AP wants to shut him down.