Showing posts with label Black Dysfunction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Dysfunction. Show all posts

Saturday, August 27, 2016

The Problems With Black People: a Fred Reed Article

Fred Reed isn't always right, but he's right about this:  the chronic problems of black people appear unsolvable and intractable.  Fred writes:

It isn’t working. The racial thing, I mean. The hunting of whites, beatings of whites, calls for attacks on whites. In the age of cell phones, the media can hide only so much.
To avoid admitting that we are seeing a racial insurgency, the media insist that the police are the problem. They are not. Blacks are unmistakably gripped by a powerful racial hatred of white people. If the police were perfect, nothing would change.
There seems to be no solution. The underlying problem that will not go away is that blacks as a race have not shown themselves able to function in a modern society. Degrees and exceptions yes, but the central fact remains. One is not supposed to say this, and would that it were not true, but it is.
Read it all here. 

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Stoking the Fires of Race Hatred

We have recently had our share of troubles here in the USA.  Blacks burn down Ferguson and Baltimore.  Racial hatred, particularly from blacks to everyone else, is white hot, no pun intended.  Now the church shooting in Charleston has again raised the masses, both black and white, to a fever pitch.

Liberals, leftists, Democrats ruthlessly try to stoke the fires of division.  Without a doubt, the hatreds and resentments of black America are largely a product of the Democratic Party and its job-killing, race baiting policies.  Only if blacks are motivated by hatred, fear and revenge, will they show up at the polls to vote Democrat.  So the Democratic campaign of propaganda must continue, i.e.:  blacks are the incessant victims of virulent white racism, blacks can never get equal treatment in jobs, education or any walk of life, Republicans all hate you if you're black, and whenever you do anything destructive or damaging, it's not your fault.

What American blacks need is the sobering truth, told and retold:  you are the authors of your own lives.  Your failures, lack of life skills, unemployment, high crime rate, dysfunctional families, bad attitudes are all your own fault, nobody else's.  Collectively, you are the biggest screw-ups in America, and the rest of Americans are less safe, less prosperous, less peaceful by your presence.  It's time to stop being the problem child of the American family.  Clean up your act.  Change your rotten, hostile attitudes.  From now on, you will be held accountable for your disastrous life choices, your failures, your dysfunctional communities.  Get your shit together.  Our patience with you grows thinner each day.

Let me lay it out for you, black folks:
1.  Stay in school until you graduate.
2.  Don't get anyone pregnant until you are old enough to marry them and support them and your child.
3.  Don't commit crime:  don't steal, rob, beat someone or kill anyone.  Keep your record clean.
4.  Stay off drugs.
5.  Accept responsibility whenever you screw up and violate any of the first four items.
6.  STFU about "racism."  Accept the fact that it is your own rotten behavior and attitudes that cause the racial prejudice directed at you.  You are major contributors to so-called racism. You are far from the innocent sheep you pretend to be.  HINT:  take a look at crime statistics by race.  Guess who are the worst offenders?
7.  Get a job.  Learn job skills.  Continually add to those skills with education and training.  Stay off welfare.
8.  Keep your family together, love your kids, teach them the civilizational skills they need to prosper:  education, job training, basic manners, good citizenship, responsible parenthood, racial and religious tolerance, personal responsibility.

It ain't rocket science folks.  Every other ethnic group in the country has long ago figured it out.  Why can't you?

Friday, January 16, 2015

Erick Erickson Disappoints on Honest Discussion About Race #Redstate #ErickErickson

We all know that progressives and leftists have a hair-pin trigger regarding racial questions.  Say the wrong word, express the wrong sentiment, and you face severe social ostracism and professional ruin.  Any implication that black people are different from other races, other than in skin color, results in paroxysms of outrage and moral posturing.  However, this knee-jerk reaction is not limited to left wing moonbats; many conservatives suffer from this neurological malady as well.  In my opinion, Erick Erickson of Redstate.com is one of them.

Erickson still insists that the GOP made a mistake in not removing Steve Scalise from his committee position.   This in spite of Scalise's total exoneration of false accusations of racism.  To refresh your memory, Scalise spoke at a Civic Organization many years ago, along with other speakers, on such benign topics as neighborhood watch, how to give CPR and (for Scalise) a tax bill winding through the Louisiana legislature.   Unknown to Scalise, the  hotel meeting room where he spoke was used later that day by an alleged white supremacist group, thereby infecting Scalise with racism by osmosis.  In truth, the dubious attempt to slander Scalise is a typical act of Democrat bad faith.  It's called "guilt by association," an old and unethical strategy to smear one's opponents.  Erickson, however, appears too obtuse to see through it.

Now Erickson has found a new soapbox on which to pose and posture, that of  Dave Agema, a Republican congressman from Michigan.  Dave Agema republished a post from American Renaissance, an online newsletter that I link to (see left sidebar), that has caused liberal Republicans and faux conservatives like Erickson to hyperventilate and do a convincing imitation of the Southern Poverty Law Center.   The article was unflattering to criminal blacks.  Hell, TRUTH is unflattering to criminal blacks.

The article that Agema linked to was written by a public defender, a self-described liberal Democrat.  The article is called Confessions of a Public Defender.  The author describes the behavior and attitudes of blacks that he has represented at trial, as well as those of other racial groups he has served.  His descriptions and conclusions are highly credible and believable, especially if one has read Colin Flaherty's recent book, White Girl Bleed a Lot.

Erickson is now advocating that Agema be removed from his committee post for republishing that article.  His post "The Question on Dave Agema is Not Difficult," tells why.  Ironically, the post is right above another Erickson post titled  "New York Times Endorses Thought Crimes."  Hypocritical much, Erick?

Honest discussions about race are likely to put blacks in a bad light (all those nasty crime statistics, mob violence, incarceration rates, knockout games and such).  Therefore, anyone who wants to discuss black dysfunction will be slandered from here to Hoboken.  Black people, after all, are only white people with dark skin -- a notion that I abandoned after the O.J. verdict in 1995.

To be sure, there are many black people who think and act civilly and intelligently, and are a credit to society.  However, the black underclass is a major problem for society, and those problems should be discussed openly, not suppressed for partisan political reasons.

Erickson states:
On his Facebook page Agema asserts the inferiority of blacks, that they cannot control their impulses, and that they cannot reason.
Erickson is wrong.  Agema did not assert "inferiority," and the comment on impulse control and reasoning ability is that of the public defender who is quoted, not Agema.  The public defender wrote:
However, my experience has also taught me that blacks are different by almost any measure to all other people. They cannot reason as well. They cannot communicate as well. They cannot control their impulses as well. They are a threat to all who cross their paths, black and non-black alike.

I do not know the solution to this problem. I do know that it is wrong to deceive the public. Whatever solutions we seek should be based on the truth rather than what we would prefer was the truth [Emphasis added for Erickson's benefit].  As for myself, I will continue do my duty to protect the rights of all who need me.
Possibly one of the dumbest things Erickson wrote in his hit piece is the assertion that
The Party of Lincoln should abide no person who cites Klansmen and no person who asserts that black citizens are inferior.
Such egregious moral posing and posturing is truly reprehensible.   With Republicans like Erickson, who needs Democrats?  However, let us see what Lincoln actually did say about blacks vs whites:
I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.
And Lincoln also said this:
Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.
Lincoln's comments were truly outrageous.  We should strip him of his Party credentials as well.  And give a big horse laugh to Erick Erickson, whose ignorance of history (and race) is appalling.


Thursday, November 27, 2014

Fighting the Race Fanatics on Twitter

I was involved in a Twitter argument with a group of dumb, brainless college youths last night.  We were arguing about the extent of black crime.  I argued that it is widespread, that blacks' problems are a result of their terrible attitudes and propensity to violence, especially in rioting, robbing and vandalizing stores.

These college twerps remind me of myself at their age.  They want simplistic answers to pressing social problems.  Bias against blacks by other races can only be the result of ignorance, a lack of education, or low intelligence.  When I cited the evidence of crime statistics by race, one of my antagonists, a young, white woman, erupted in obscenities and vulgar insults.  I was not offended.  Her outpouring of bile was evidence that I had damaged her comfortable illusions.

Of course, I was denounced as a racist, a Nazi and a Klan member, as well as a windbag, and a senile old man.  None of these insults stopped me from running my bulldozer of truth over their infantile and uninformed beliefs about race.  I enjoyed their screams of pain, anguish and anger as I did so.

My iPhone battery was running down, so I plugged it in to recharge and went to bed.  Well into the night I was serenaded by the ping-ping-ping of more tweets pouring in.  I ignored them and went to sleep.

I am reading White Girl Bleed A Lot, by Colin Flaherty, and it is shocking.  Black mob violence is substantially more widespread than most people know about.  That's because black wildings are often not reported by either the media or the police.  When mob violence is reported, it is described as groups of teenagers, gang members, youths blowing off steam, and revelers.  They are not described as what they are, mobs of young blacks, both male and female, attacking Whites, Asians and Hispanics at random, beating and robbing them, for fun and frolic.  Sometimes, victims are seriously injured or even killed, by being stabbed, shot or hit over the head.

The thugs know that they will most likely not be stopped or arrested.  These incidents generally happen at public celebrations like the Fourth of July, St. Patrick's Day or state and county fairs.  Major cities where these wildings occur regularly include Philadelphia, Chicago, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Baltimore, Kansas City, Portland, Cleveland and others.  Fairgrounds, beaches, parks, shopping malls and downtown areas are the most common locations.

Very often, flash mobs of young blacks will enter a convenience store and begin stealing everything in sight, carrying out whatever they want.  There are too many to stop and arrest.  They are doing what Michael Brown did in Ferguson, entering, stealing and leaving.  Except that Michael Brown had only one fellow thug with him, not a whole crowd as is the usual practice. [See video of thugs looting the same Ferguson convenience store here.]

Whatever is to be done to stop black wildings (see definition below), the very first step is to admit that the problem exists.  The next step is to publicize it and make people aware of it.  Obviously, the practice of self-censorship about the problem must cease.

wilding2
noun

1.  the practice by a group of youths of going on a random spree of violent criminal activity.
2.  an instance of this.


A List of Videos of Black Wildings, as described in the book Black Girl Bleed A Lot can be found here.

Sunday, August 17, 2014

Black Victimization By Whites Is A Myth, and Other Ferguson Facts

Powerline has weighed in on the Ferguson debacle, and quotes some interesting facts about alleged "black victimization by whites":
Although there is no apparent connection to the Brown case, it is true that African-Americans are disproportionately charged and convicted of crimes. But that is because they disproportionately commit crimes. The black homicide rate is eight times the white rate. We know from victims’ reports that the frequent prosecution and conviction of blacks is due to the fact that they commit so many crimes. Scott has done as much as anyone to report on this fact. The idea that the judicial system discriminates against African-Americans is a myth.
Read the whole thing.

Fred, of Fred on Everything says this about the Ferguson shooting:
What actually happened in Ferguson? God only knows. Of course we are hearing from talking heads with bargain-basement IQs that a policeman, from racial motives, shot an unarmed black kid because he refused to stop walking in the street. Did it happen? Possibly. I wasn’t there. But the story smells.
Reflect: Every white cop short of the orbit of Neptune knows that if he shoots a black, he faces dismemberment in the media, loss of job and pension, probable criminal charges locally by a publicity-seeking prosecutor, a well-funded civil suit that he can’t afford filed by surviving family members, and trumped-up federal civil-rights charges from an attorney general who doesn't like whites.
Read it all here.

Friday, August 02, 2013

The New Mind Control: Use the Word "Nigger" and Your Life Is Ruined

Actor Tim Allen has a point.  The use of the term "N-Word" is just as offensive as the term it represents, the word "nigger."

The word "nigger" is at least 200 years old (probably more), and didn't start out as an ethnic slur or insult.  Blacks themselves invented the word.  It is derived from the word "Niger," meaning black.  There is an African nation by that name, and also one named Nigeria.  Mark Twain used the word repeatedly in his fictional tales of blacks and whites in the antebellum South.  Although his fiction subtly advocated racial equality, it has been condemned by modern blacks for the use of a word that was not at all offensive at the time that Twain used it.

"Nigger" is only a hateful word by context.  It is not inherently hateful in and of itself.  However, the left has instituted unofficial speech codes into our society, so that if you use the word "nigger" in any context, be it semantical, historical or literary, you have broken an unofficial rule that carries great consequences.

Those consequences are social and professional ostracism.  Paula Deen is only the latest example in a long line of wrecked careers and lives.  She admitted she used the word thirty years ago after being assaulted by a criminal black man.  Her publisher and various department store chains immediately dropped her cookbooks and her television cooking show was canceled.  Ridiculous.

Note:  I do not advocate the careless use of the word "nigger," especially as a racial insult.  If you google the word and select "images," a ton of really offensive images are displayed.  However, use of the word does not turn any black into a pillar of salt.  So why are we so racially hypersensitive to the biggest group of screw-ups in human history?  (If you doubt me, look up crime statistics by race, illegitimacy by race and percentage of prison inmates by race.)

What blacks need is the unvarnished truth about themselves, and a great deal of societal pressure to clean up their act.  Instead, we have been programmed to do double back flips in order to never, ever offend any black, anywhere, for any reason.  They are the "sacred other," the Tribe of Dali Lamas among us, and anything less is sacrilegious, an apostasy that can never be overlooked or forgiven.

This semantical tyranny must stop.  I'm with you, Tim Allen.

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Jared Taylor's Open Letter to Eric Holder: Explains a Lot About Black Behavior and "Racism"

Jared Taylor has accepted Eric Holder's public invitation for a new discussion on race, and has asked Holder for a face to face discussion.  He won't get it of course.  Liberals are not interested in defusing black racial animus but only in organizing, rationalizing and focusing it into a potent political force for socialism.  This they have done and will continue to do.

However, Taylor's letter makes some points on blacks that are worth repeating here, because knowing the true facts of the racial divide cannot do harm, and may do good, if only to encourage non-blacks to arm and defend themselves.

His first point is on black crime:
I would imagine you used statistics from your own Justice Department to show that blacks are at least seven times more likely than people of other races to commit violent crimes, and that young black men are the most dangerous people in America. I hope you explained that Americans will be suspicious of blacks for as long as they continue to commit so many crimes. This may be unfortunate for law-abiding blacks but the fault is not with the police or with neighborhood watchmen; it is with other blacks.
This is correct.  It is why profiling of blacks is necessary for our own safety and survival.  Young black men like Trayvon Martin are the largest contributors to violent crime in America.

His second point is that a bias against blacks does not in itself constitute a "hate crime," and does not invalidate the right of anyone, including an open "racist," from defending himself against a black attacker:
This is not an academic question, Mr. Holder. I hold unorthodox views on race and have expressed them publicly. Does this mean that if I am attacked by a black and have to defend myself with lethal force you will investigate me? What if it could be proven that I am the wickedest racist in America? Does that mean I have forfeited my right to defend myself against a black attacker? I hope you understand my dismay, but this is very clearly the logic of your investigation: that I will lose very important rights if I have views of which you disapprove.
Finally, Taylor mentions the horrible truth of which no one in society dare speak, that of IQ differences between the races, which is undoubtedly the major cause of black dysfunction:
Finally, on an entirely different matter, you seem to think that blacks and whites are precisely equal in ability and temperament, and that if there are any differences in outcome between the two groups, it can only be due to white “racism.” In the interest of the honest discussion you want, I invite you to reflect on the fact that American blacks have an average IQ of 85 whereas whites have an average of 100. I also invite you to consider the huge body of evidence that suggests this difference has a substantially genetic cause.
Because of this natural variability in IQ, blacks, as a group, are not going to equal the achievements of other racial groups, not anytime soon.  Maybe after another 500 years of interbreeding with other racial groups and the enlargement of their accessible gene pool, or through scientific achievements in genetic engineering, but most certainly not in our lifetimes.  Their dysfunction is most assuredly not the result of irrational non-black racism, and any policy initiatives that are based on that myth will not solve any problems and will more than likely make them worse.

Read the whole essay at this link.